Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Cognitive control of sequential knowledge in 2-year-olds: evidence from an incidental sequence-learning and generation-task

By Andrew J. Bremner, Denis Mareschal, Arnaud Destrebecqz and Axel Cleeremans

Abstract

Thirty-eight two-year-olds were trained under incidental instructions on a six element deterministic sequence of spatial locations. Following training, participants were informed of the presence of a sequence and asked to either reproduce or suppress the learned material. Children's production of the trained sequence was modulated by these instructions. When asked to suppress the trained sequence they were able to increase generation of paths that were not from the training sequence. Their performance was thus dependent on active suppresion of knowledge rather than a random generation strategy. This degree of control in two-year-olds stands in stark contrast to 3-year-olds' failure to control explicitly instructed rule-based knowledge (as measured the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task). We suggest that this is because the incidental nature of the learning enables the acquisition of a more procedural form of knowledge with which this age-group have more experience prior to the onset of fluent language

Publisher: Sage
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gold.ac.uk:26

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. doi
  2. (2001). All together now: When dissociations between knowledge and action disappear. doi
  3. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. doi
  4. (1987). Attentional requirements for learning: Evidence from performance measures. doi
  5. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. doi
  6. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. doi
  7. (1996). Direct and indirect measures of sequence learning. doi
  8. (2005). Disentangling dimensions in the dimensional change card sorting task. doi
  9. (2003). Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task. doi
  10. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in doi
  11. (1991). Learning the structure of sequence events. doi
  12. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations and dissociations of consciousness. doi
  13. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.
  14. (1991). The “windows task” as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects. doi
  15. (2003). The automated windows task: the performance of preschool children, children with autism, and children with moderate learning difficulties. doi
  16. (2003). The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. In doi
  17. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. doi
  18. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. doi
  19. (2002). What causes 3-year-olds’ difficulty on the dimensional change card sorting task? doi
  20. (1994). What makes strategic deception difficult for children – the deception or the strategy? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.