Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

CT Scan Screening for Lung Cancer: Risk Factors for Nodules and Malignancy in a High-Risk Urban Cohort

By Alissa K. Greenberg, Feng Lu, Judith D. Goldberg, Ellen Eylers, Jun-Chieh Tsay, Ting-An Yie, David Naidich, Georgeann McGuinness, Harvey Pass, Kam-Meng Tchou-Wong, Doreen Addrizzo-Harris, Abraham Chachoua, Bernard Crawford and William N. Rom
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2009). A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography. Three-year results from the DANTE trial.
  2. (2007). Ability of low-dose helical CT to distinguish between benign and malignant noncalcified lung nodules.
  3. (2010). An actuarial approach to comparing early stage and late stage lung cancer mortality and survival.
  4. (2010). Are airflow obstruction and radiographic evidence of emphysema risk factors for lung cancer? : A nested case-control study using quantitative emphysema analysis.
  5. (2007). Assessing the relationship between lung cancer risk and emphysema detected on low-dose CT of the chest.
  6. (2008). Association of radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction with lung cancer.
  7. (2008). Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review.
  8. (2007). Baseline results of the Depiscan study: A French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR).
  9. (2007). Clinical significance of a solitary gournd-glass opacity (GGO) lesion of the lung detected by chest CT.
  10. (2007). Computer tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes.
  11. (2012). CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT.
  12. (2005). CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Five-year prospective experience.
  13. (2004). CT Screening for Lung Cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans.
  14. (2010). Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening. A randomized trial.
  15. (2011). Current cigarette smoking prevalence among working adults – United States,
  16. (2012). Decision making in patients with pulmonary nodules.Am
  17. (2012). Doubling times and CT screen-detected lung cancers in the Pittsburgh lung screening study.Am
  18. (2001). Early Lung Cancer Action Project: Initial findings on repeat screening.
  19. (1999). Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.
  20. (2005). Early lung cancer detection using spiral computer tomography and positron emission tomography.
  21. (1984). Early Lung Cancer Detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic Study.
  22. (2012). Emphysema detected on computed tomography and risk of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.02.019.
  23. (2010). Evolving Early Detection Modalities in Lung Cancer Screening, in Principles and Practice of Lung Cancer: The Official Reference Text of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,
  24. (2006). Extended lung cancer incidence follow-up in the Mayo Lung Project and overdiagnosis.JNatl
  25. (2007). Fiveyear Lung Cancer Screening Experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers.
  26. (2005). Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society.
  27. (2007). Low- dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos- exposed population: baseline results of a prospective, nonrandomized feasibility trial- an alpe-adria thoracic oncology multidisciplinary group study.
  28. (2006). Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators,
  29. (2000). Lung Cancer Mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: Impact of extended follow-up.
  30. (2008). Lung cancer risk following detection of pulmonary scarring by chest radiography in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.
  31. (2011). Lung cancer risk prediction to select smokers for screening CT-a model based on the Italian COSMOS trial.
  32. (2003). Lung Cancer Screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience.
  33. (2005). Lung cancer screening,
  34. (1991). Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretive strategies.
  35. (2009). Management of lung nodules detected by volume
  36. (1996). Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography.
  37. (2008). Pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions-large size and a history of lung cancer are risk factors for growth.
  38. (2005). Pulmonary nodules 10 mm or less in diameter with ground-glass opacity component detected by high-resolution computed tomography have a high possibility of malignancy.
  39. (2005). Relationship between reduced forced expiratory volume in one second and the risk of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  40. (2001). Results of threeyear mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner.
  41. (1997). Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer.
  42. (2004). Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computer tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers.
  43. (2002). Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computer tomography.
  44. (1991). Screening for Lung Cancer: A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.
  45. (2011). Screening for lung cancer: For patients at increased risk for lung cancer, it works.
  46. (2000). Screening for lung cancer.
  47. (2011). Screening Research Team
  48. (2002). Staging classification of lung cancer. A critical evaluation.
  49. (2008). The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS): Outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.