Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Anthropology and parallelism:The individual as a universal

By Dr. Marvin/E. Kirsh


It is difficult to define perspective within sets that are self belonging. For example in the study of mankind, anthropology, both men and their studies fall into the same category that contains the topic outline. This situation entails a universal quality of uniqueness, an instance of it, to the topic of anthropology that may be viewed in parallel with the topic of nature as the set of unique particulars. Yet one\ud might assent to the notion in the inclusive study of man, anthropology, that nothing in its’ content\ud should conceivably be construed to exceed it, though in approaches to the topic, reference to the topic\ud of nature, unavoided, refer to the scientific topic of nature in which contemporary notions, when contrasted, exceed the perceptual experience of nature. In this presentation problems in approaches\ud and in the application of available tools for analysis to the study of man will be discussed. Framed\ud with respect to a concept of parallelism, notions and stimuli are introduced to augment and reorient\ud towards a more creative perspective with respect to the organization of first perspective considerations in studies. The theories of relativity, the idea of mathematical relations for simultaneous\ud events, the presence of artifactual paradoxes as they are reflected in thinking and the scientific tools\ud applied towards investigations are discussed and hopefully highlighted so that they may hopefully\ud be perceived distinctly form realities involved in the pursuit of studies.\u

Topics: Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy of Science
Publisher: Academic Journals Inc.
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (2002). Civilization and Its Discontents",
    2. (1997). Folk Psychology as a Theory", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter
    3. (2004). Is quantum mechanics pointless?”
    4. (1956). The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts"

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.