Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue

By Bruno G. Bara, Maurizio Tirassa and Marina Zettin

Abstract

We are interested in the validation of a cognitive theory of human communication, grounded in a speech acts perspective. The theory we refer to is outlined, and a number of predictions are drawn from it. We report a series of protocols administered to 13 brain-injured subjects and to a comparable control group. The tasks included direct and indirect speech acts, irony, deceits, failures of communication, and theory of mind inferences. All the predicted trends of difficulty are consistently verified; in particular, difficulty increases from direct/indirect speech acts to irony, from irony to deceits, and from deceits to failure recovery. This trend symmetrically shows both in the successful situation and in the failure situation. Further, failure situations prove more difficult to handle than the relevant successful situation. In sharp contrast with previous literature, there is no difference between the subjects' comprehension of direct and indirect speech acts. The results are discussed in the light of our theoretical approach

Topics: Cognitive Psychology, Neurolinguistics, Neuropsychology, Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Mind, Psycholinguistics
Publisher: Academic Press
Year: 1997
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:6810
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://cogprints.org/6810/1/19... (external link)
  • http://cogprints.org/6810/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1980). A plan-based analysis of indirect speech acts.
    2. (1994). A pragmatic approach to neurolinguistics: Requests (re)considered.
    3. (1985). Adult aphasia rehabilitation: Applied pragmatics.
    4. (1980). Analyzing intention in utterances.
    5. (1989). Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording.
    6. (1987). Appreciation of pragmatic interpretation of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients.
    7. (1991). Artificial intelligence and the representation problem.
    8. (1977). Artificial intelligence: A personal view.
    9. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax.
    10. (1980). Circumscription—A form of non-monotonic reasoning.
    11. (1995). Cognitive science: A developmental approach to the simulation of the mind.
    12. (1990). Comments on Jones and on
    13. (1987). Compensation and language recovery in the chronic aphasic patient.
    14. (1988). Compensatory strategies in the language of closed head injured patients.
    15. (1984). Competence and performance in the design of natural language systems.
    16. (1969). Convention. A philosophical study.
    17. (1983). Conversation and behavior games in the pragmatics of dialogue.
    18. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man.
    19. (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge:
    20. (1992). Differential pragmatic language loss after closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature.
    21. (1990). Discourse in a right-hemisphere brain-damaged subject.
    22. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?
    23. (1992). Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism.
    24. (1993). Failures, exploitations and deceits in communication.
    25. (1962). How to do things with words. London:
    26. (1981). Incorporating parameters of natural conversation in aphasia treatment. In R. Chapey (Eds.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia.
    27. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts.
    28. (1989). Knowledge for communication. In
    29. (1975). Logic and conversation. In
    30. (1975). London:
    31. (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans.
    32. (1997). Mental states in communication.
    33. (1995). Mindblindness. An essay on autism and theory of mind.
    34. (1991). Natural theories of mind. Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading.
    35. (1982). Nonverbal communication and aphasia: A review.
    36. (1963). Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: A significance test for linear ranks.
    37. (1984). Planning and understanding speech acts by interpersonal games. In
    38. (1985). Planning English sentences. Cambridge:
    39. (1983). Planning perlocutionary acts.
    40. (1990). Plans as complex mental attitudes. In
    41. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge:
    42. (1983). Pragmatic aspects of communication in braindamaged patients. In
    43. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to negotiate requests.
    44. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge:
    45. (1994). Pretending and believing: Issues in the theory of ToMM.
    46. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of ‘‘theory of mind.’’
    47. (1993). Primate calls, human language, and nonverbal communication.
    48. (1983). Principles of pragmatics.
    49. (1986). Relevance. Communication and cognition.
    50. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence.
    51. (1981). Speech act assignment. In
    52. (1957). Syntactic structures.
    53. (1988). Tactical deception in primates.
    54. (1990). The child’s theory of mind.
    55. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder:
    56. (1992). The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia.
    57. (1986). The communicative impact of non-fluent aphasia on the dialog behavior of linguistical unimpaired partners.
    58. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit.
    59. (1991). Understanding the representational mind.
    60. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.