Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Camouflaging in a Complex Environment—Octopuses Use Specific Features of Their Surroundings for Background Matching

By Noam Josef, Piero Amodio, Graziano Fiorito and Nadav Shashar


Living under intense predation pressure, octopuses evolved an effective and impressive camouflaging ability that exploits features of their surroundings to enable them to “blend in.” To achieve such background matching, an animal may use general resemblance and reproduce characteristics of its entire surroundings, or it may imitate a specific object in its immediate environment. Using image analysis algorithms, we examined correlations between octopuses and their backgrounds. Field experiments show that when camouflaging, Octopus cyanea and O. vulgaris base their body patterns on selected features of nearby objects rather than attempting to match a large field of view. Such an approach enables the octopus to camouflage in partly occluded environments and to solve the problem of differences in appearance as a function of the viewing inclination of the observer

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (1859) On the Origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. United Kingdom,
  2. A (1988a) The skin of Cephalopods (Coleoids): general and special adaptations.
  3. (1978). A predator’s view of animal color patterns.
  4. (1985). A spatial filtering approach to texture analysis.
  5. Adaptive coloration in animals:
  6. (1988). Adaptive Coloration in Young Cuttlefish (Sepia Officinalis L.): The Morphology and Development of Body Patterns and Their Relation to Behaviour.
  7. (1992). Amplitude spectra of natural images.
  8. (1964). An analysis of background color-matching in amphibians and reptiles.
  9. (1981). An overview of the relationships between mimicry and crypsis.
  10. (2011). Animal camouflage: an introduction.
  11. (1918). Camouflage. The scientific monthly 7:
  12. (2009). Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration.
  13. (2006). Color blindness and contrast perception in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) determined by a visual sensorimotor assay.
  14. (1976). color change. Environmental Physiology of Animals.
  15. (1996). Colour-blind camouflage.
  16. (2011). Crypsis through background matching.
  17. (1998). Crypsis through disruptive coloration in an isopod.
  18. (1999). Crypsis, conspicuousness, mimicry and polyphenism as antipredator defences of foraging octopuses on Indo-Pacific coral reefs, with a method of quantifying crypsis from video tapes.
  19. (2008). Cuttlefish camouflage: The effects of substrate contrast and size in evoking uniform, mottle or disruptive body patterns.
  20. (2001). Cuttlefish camouflage: visual perception of size, contrast and number of white squares on artificial checkerboard substrata initiates disruptive coloration.
  21. (2001). Cuttlefish Cue Visually on Area—Not Shape or Aspect Ratio—of Light Objects in the Substrate to Produce Disruptive Body Patterns for Camouflage.
  22. (2006). Cuttlefish responses to visual orientation of substrates, water flow and a model of motion camouflage.
  23. (2011). Cuttlefish use visual cues to determine arm postures for camouflage. Proc Biol Sci.
  24. Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences:
  25. (2005). Disruptive Body Patterning of Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) Requires Visual Information Regarding Edges and Contrast of Objects in Natural Substrate Backgrounds.
  26. (2007). Disruptive coloration elicited on controlled natural substrates in cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.
  27. (2007). Disruptive coloration in cuttlefish: a visual perception mechanism that regulates ontogenetic adjustment of skin patterning.
  28. (1977). Evidence that Octopus is Colour Blind.
  29. Fiorito G A catalogue of body patterning in Cephalopoda:
  30. (1997). Foraging and associated behavior by Octopus cyanea Gray, 1849 on a coral atoll, French Polynesia.
  31. (2007). Interactive effects of size, contrast, intensity and configuration of background objects in evoking disruptive camouflage in cuttlefish.
  32. (2000). MATLAB and Octave functions for computer vision and image processing.
  33. Messenger JB Cephalopod Behaviour:
  34. (1996). Natural image statistics and efficient coding*.
  35. (2012). Optical signals: animal communication and light: Indiana University Press. Camouflaging in a
  36. (2007). Perception of visual texture and the expression of disruptive camouflage by the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.
  37. (1992). Predator Psychology and the Evolution of Prey Coloration. Natural Enemies: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  38. (1984). Progressive background in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis.
  39. (1983). Sea life In: Alon A, ed. Plants and animals of the land of israel Israel: Ministry of defence publishing house.
  40. (1977). Skin patterning in Octopus and other genera.
  41. (2002). Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images.
  42. (1994). Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods.
  43. (1940). The Colour Changes and Colour Patterns of Sepia officinalis L.
  44. (1990). The evolution of cryptic coloration .
  45. (2011). To Be Seen or to Hide: Visual Characteristics of Body Patterns for Camouflage and Communication in the Australian Giant Cuttlefish Sepia apama.
  46. (1991). Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions.
  47. (2004). Visual Background Features That Elicit Mottled Body Patterns in Cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.
  48. (1958). Visual pigments of the octopus and cuttlefish.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.