Location of Repository

Plastic Traits of an Exotic Grass Contribute to Its Abundance but Are Not Always Favourable

By Jennifer Firn, Suzanne M. Prober and Yvonne M. Buckley


In herbaceous ecosystems worldwide, biodiversity has been negatively impacted by changed grazing regimes and nutrient enrichment. Altered disturbance regimes are thought to favour invasive species that have a high phenotypic plasticity, although most studies measure plasticity under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and then assume plasticity is an advantage in the field. Here, we compare trait plasticity between three co-occurring, C4 perennial grass species, an invader Eragrostis curvula, and natives Eragrostis sororia and Aristida personata to grazing and fertilizer in a three-year field trial. We measured abundances and several leaf traits known to correlate with strategies used by plants to fix carbon and acquire resources, i.e. specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf nutrient concentrations (N, C∶N, P), assimilation rates (Amax) and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE). In the control treatment (grazed only), trait values for SLA, leaf C∶N ratios, Amax and PNUE differed significantly between the three grass species. When trait values were compared across treatments, E. curvula showed higher trait plasticity than the native grasses, and this correlated with an increase in abundance across all but the grazed/fertilized treatment. The native grasses showed little trait plasticity in response to the treatments. Aristida personata decreased significantly in the treatments where E. curvula increased, and E. sororia abundance increased possibly due to increased rainfall and not in response to treatments or invader abundance. Overall, we found that plasticity did not favour an increase in abundance of E. curvula under the grazed/fertilized treatment likely because leaf nutrient contents increased and subsequently its' palatability to consumers. E. curvula also displayed a higher resource use efficiency than the native grasses. These findings suggest resource conditions and disturbance regimes can be manipulated to disadvantage the success of even plastic exotic species

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3335023
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles



    1. (2006). A comparison of plastic responses to competition by invasive and non-invasive congeners in Commelinaceae.
    2. (1987). A comparison of six methods of botanical analysis in the montane grasslands of Natal.
    3. (2006). A conceptual model of land use effects on the structure and function of herbaceous vegetation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
    4. (2003). A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide.
    5. (2008). A new framework for predicting invasive plant species.
    6. (2001). A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content.
    7. (2009). African lovegrass in Australia: a valuable pasture species or embarrassing invader.
    8. (2010). Alternative states models provide an effective framework for invasive species control and restoration of native communities.
    9. (2009). An Invasive Plant Paradox.
    10. (2005). Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems?
    11. (2005). Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships.
    12. (2002). AusGrass: Grasses of Australia Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra and Environmental Protection Agency,
    13. (1998). Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects.
    14. (2010). California annual grass invaders: the drivers or passengers of change?
    15. (1964). Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In:
    16. (2007). Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum.
    17. (2008). Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment.
    18. (2001). Do disturbances alter competitive hierarchies? Mechanisms of change following gap creation.
    19. (2011). Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A metaanalyses.
    20. (1988). Effect of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the Western Australian wheatbelt.
    21. (1968). Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees and some other African lovegrasses.
    22. (2008). Ever since Clements: from succession to vegetation dynamics and understanding intervention.
    23. (2000). Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility.
    24. (2001). Growth, leaf characteristics and spore production in native and invasive tree ferns in Hawaii.
    25. (2007). Implementation of a novel framework for assessing species plasticity in biological invasions: responses of Centaurea and Crepis to phosphorus and water availability.
    26. (2010). Intraspecific functional variabillity: extent, structure and sources of variation.
    27. (2007). Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover?
    28. (2003). Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species.
    29. (2006). Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9: 981–993. Even Plastic Exotics Can Be Controlled
    30. (2006). Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits.
    31. (1999). Leaf contruction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii.
    32. (2007). Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community- and global-scale comparisons.
    33. (1986). Life history of colonizing plants: some demographic, genetic and physiological features.
    34. (2008). Managing beyond the invader: manipulating disturbance of natives simplifies control efforts.
    35. (2000). Mixed-Effects Models
    36. (2011). Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity.
    37. (2010). Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies.
    38. (2002). Native Grasses: an identification handbook for Temperate Australia.
    39. (2006). Novel Ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order.
    40. (1968). Palatability, chemical composition, and animal gains from selection pf Weeping Lovegrass, Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees.
    41. (2003). Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration.
    42. (2008). Phenotypic plasticity and plant invasions: is it all Jack?
    43. (1986). Plant Analysis and Interpretation Manual.
    44. (2005). Plant traits predict impact of invading species: an analyses of herbaceous vegetation in the subtropics.
    45. (2003). Relationship between maximum leaf photosynthesis, nitrogen content and specific leaf area in Balearic endemic and non-endemic Mediterranean species.
    46. (2004). Resource pulses, species interactions, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments.
    47. (2007). Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in lowresource systems.
    48. (2008). Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants.
    49. (2006). Statistics for correlated data: phylogenies, space, and time.
    50. (1992). The Australian Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods.
    51. (1958). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants.
    52. (2000). The paradox of invasion.
    53. (2004). The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents.
    54. (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum.
    55. (2002). Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species.
    56. (2007). Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W, ed. Biological Invasions.
    57. (2001). Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends
    58. (1996). What attributes make some plants species more invasive?
    59. (2011). When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology? Perspectives
    60. (2011). Why research on traits of invasive plants tells us very little.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.