Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Response probability and latency: a straight line, an operational definition of meaning and the structure of short term memory

By Dr. Eugen Tarnow

Abstract

The functional relationship between response probability and time is investigated in data from Rubin, Hinton and Wenzel (1999) and Anderson (1981). Recall/recognition probabilities and search times are linearly related through stimulus presentation lags from 6 seconds to 600 seconds in the former experiment and for repeated learning of words in the latter. The slope of the response time vs. probability function is related to the meaningfulness of the items used. The Rubin et al data suggest that only one memory structure is present or that all memory structures probed show the same linear relation of response probability and time. Both sets of data also suggest that the memory items, presumably in the neocortex, have a finite effective size that shrinks in a logarithmic fashion as the time since stimulus presentation increases or the overlearning decreases, away from the start of the search. According to the logarithmic decay, the size of the memory items decreases to a couple of neurons at about 1500 seconds for recall and 1100 seconds for recognition – this could be the time scale for a short term memory being converted to a long term memory. The incorrect recall time saturates in the Rubin et al data (it is not linear throughout the experiments), suggesting a limited size of the short term memory structure: the time to search through the structure for recall is 1.7 seconds. For recognition the corresponding time is about 0.4 seconds, to compare with the 0.243 seconds given by the data analysis of Cavanagh of Sternberg-like experiments (1972)

Topics: Brain Imaging, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Cognitive Psychology, Perceptual Cognitive Psychology, Neuroanatomy
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:6209

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory.
  2. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.
  3. (1993). Activation, attention and short term memory”,
  4. (1998). An Oscillatory Short-Term Memory Buffer Model Can Account for Data on the Sternberg Task”.
  5. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data”,
  6. (1981). Interference: The relationship between response latency and response accuracy.
  7. (1995). Learning and Memory.
  8. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization, which reflects global stimulus properties.
  9. (1972). Relation between the Immediate Memory Span and the Memory Search Rate”,
  10. (1963). Response speed changes in an Estes’ pairedassociate ‘miniature’ experiment.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.