Article thumbnail

Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation

By Daphne Roumani and Konstantinos Moutoussis

Abstract

When different stimuli are presented dichoptically, perception alternates between the two in a stochastic manner. After a long-lasting and rigorous debate, there is growing consensus that this phenomenon, known as binocular rivalry (BR), is the result of a dynamic competition occurring at multiple levels of the visual hierarchy. The role of low- and high-level adaptation mechanisms in controlling these perceptual alternations has been a key issue in the rivalry literature. Both types of adaptation are dispersed throughout the visual system and have an equally influential, or even causal, role in determining perception. Such an explanation of BR is also in accordance with the relationship between the latter and attention. However, an overall explanation of this intriguing perceptual phenomenon needs to also include noise as an equally fundamental process involved in the stochastic resonance of perceptual bistability

Topics: Neuroscience
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3291116
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry.
  2. A Opt. Image Sci.
  3. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys’ percepts during binocular rivalry.
  4. (2004). Attention alters appearance.
  5. (2011). Attentional modulation of binocular rivalry.
  6. (2007). B r a s c a m p ,J .W . ,K n a p e n
  7. (2009). B r a s c a m p ,J .W . ,P e a r s o n ,J . ,B l a k e
  8. (2009). Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistabilty.
  9. (2012). Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation.
  10. (1995). Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.
  11. (2011). Binocular rivalry requires visualattention.
  12. (2010). Binocular rivalry: a timedependence of eye and stimulus contributions.
  13. (2011). Binocular vision.
  14. (2009). Bistable perception modeled as competing stochastic integrations at two levels.
  15. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.
  16. (2004). Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry.
  17. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.
  18. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision – part the first. on some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision.
  19. (2006). depends on visual awareness.
  20. (2010). Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry.
  21. (2008). doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000430 K a m p h u i s e n ,A .P . ,B a u e r ,M . ,a n d
  22. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.
  23. (2004). Fusion and rivalry are dependent on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli.
  24. (2008). General validity of Levelt’s propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry. PLoS One 3:e3473. doi:
  25. Heeger, D.J.(2000).Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry.
  26. (2011). Highlevel face adaptation depends on visual awareness: evidence from continuous flash suppression.
  27. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Res.
  28. (1972). Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression.
  29. (1998). Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry. Vision Res.
  30. (2008). K l i n k ,P .C . ,v a nE e ,R .
  31. (2004). Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli.
  32. (2005). Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes.
  33. (2007). Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory.
  34. (2009). Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.
  35. (1999). Multistable Phenomena: changing views in perception.
  36. (2007). N o e s t ,A .J . ,v a nE e ,R .
  37. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain.
  38. (2011). Neuronal adaptation effects in decision making.
  39. (1965). On Binocular Rivalry. Soesterberg, Netherlands: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
  40. (2011). On the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence. PLoS One 6:e22612. doi:
  41. (2007). Onset rivalry: brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition.
  42. (2011). Percept-switch nucleation in binocular rivalry reveals local adaptation characteristics of early visual processing.
  43. (1998). perception.
  44. (2008). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback.
  45. (2007). S t o c k e r ,A .A . ,K o h n ,A
  46. (2009). Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.
  47. (2008). Sensory memory for ambiguous vision.
  48. (1998). Single units and conscious vision.
  49. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.
  50. Stereopsis and binocularrivalry.Psychol.
  51. (2006). Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry.
  52. (2009). Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability.
  53. (2007). Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity.
  54. (2007). The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry.J.
  55. (2009). The neural bases of multistableperception.
  56. (2010). The role of primary visual cortex in perceptual suppression of salient visualstimuli.
  57. (2006). The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise.
  58. (2006). Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in rivalry.
  59. (2002). Visual competition.
  60. (2003). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations.
  61. (2010). Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.
  62. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bistability.
  63. (2011). What is grouping during binocular rivalry?
  64. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
  65. (2010). Z h o u ,W . ,J i a n g ,Y . ,H e ,S . ,a n dC h e n ,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.