Article thumbnail

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Evaluating Organ Failure and Outcome of Severe Maternal Morbidity in Obstetric Intensive Care

By Antonio Oliveira-Neto, Mary A. Parpinelli, Jose G. Cecatti, Joao P. Souza and Maria H. Sousa

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in cases of severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Design. Retrospective study of diagnostic validation. Setting. An obstetric intensive care unit (ICU) in Brazil. Population. 673 women with SMM. Main Outcome Measures. mortality and SOFA score. Methods. Organ failure was evaluated according to maximum score for each one of its six components. The total maximum SOFA score was calculated using the poorest result of each component, reflecting the maximum degree of alteration in systemic organ function. Results. highest total maximum SOFA score was associated with mortality, 12.06 ± 5.47 for women who died and 1.87 ± 2.56 for survivors. There was also a significant correlation between the number of failing organs and maternal mortality, ranging from 0.2% (no failure) to 85.7% (≥3 organs). Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) confirmed the excellent performance of total maximum SOFA score for cases of SMM (AUC = 0.958). Conclusions. Total maximum SOFA score proved to be an effective tool for evaluating severity and estimating prognosis in cases of SMM. Maximum SOFA score may be used to conceptually define and stratify the degree of severity in cases of SMM

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: The Scientific World Journal
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3289867
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1993). A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a
  2. (2005). A r t s ,N .F .D eK e i z e r ,M .B .V r o o m ,a n dE .D eJ o n g e , “Reliability and accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring,”
  3. (1992). American College of Chest Physicians/ Society of Critical Care Medicine. Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis andorganfailureandguidelinesfortheuseofinnovativetherapies in sepsis,”
  4. (2010). Audit of severe acute maternal morbidity describing reasons for transfer and potential preventability of admissions to
  5. (2007). Clinical characteristics and outcomes of obstetric patients requiring
  6. (2004). Critical illness and pregnancy: review of a global problem,”
  7. (2005). Critically ill obstetric patients in an American and an Indian public hospital: comparison of case-mix, organ dysfunction, intensive care requirements, and outcomes,”
  8. (2004). D.R.Karnad,V.Lapsia,A.Krishnan,andV.S.Salvi,“Prognostic factors in obstetric patients admitted to an Indian intensive care unit,”
  9. (1998). De Mendonc ¸a, F. Cantraine et al., “Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study,”
  10. (2008). Epidemiology of obstetric critical care,”
  11. (2009). Factors associated with maternal death in womenadmittedtoanintensivecareunitwithseverematernal morbidity,”
  12. (1999). Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage: task force of the american college of critical care medicine, society of critical care medicine,”
  13. (1985). II: a severity of disease classification system,”
  14. (2000). Intensive care unit morbidity and mortality from eclampsia: an evaluation of the Acute
  15. (2009). Maternal critical care in obstetrics,”
  16. (2009). Maternal near miss— towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care,”
  17. (1998). Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data,”
  18. (1993). Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients,”
  19. (2001). Multicenter study of obstetric admissions to 14 intensive care units in southern
  20. (1999). Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit,”
  21. (2003). Obstetric admissions to the intensivecareunit:outcomesandseverityofillness,”Obstetrics and Gynecology,
  22. (2006). Obstetric critical care: a blueprint for improved outcomes,”
  23. (1990). Organization, Trends in Maternal Mortality:
  24. (2007). Prediction of mortality and morbidity by simplified acute physiologyscoreIIinobstetricintensivecareunitadmissions,”
  25. (2010). Pregnant and postpartumadmissionstotheintensivecareunit:asystematicreview,”
  26. (2011). Prevalidation of the WHO organ dysfunction based criteria for identificationofmaternalnearmiss,” Reproductive Health,vol.
  27. (1999). R.Moreno,J.L.Vincent,R.Matosetal.,“Theuseofmaximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study,”
  28. (2006). Relation of the sequential organ failure assessment score to morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery,”
  29. (1998). Rodr´ ıguez, “Characterization of obstetricpatientswithmultipleorganfailureintheintensivecare unit of a Havana Teaching Hospital,
  30. (2005). S.H.SoubraandK.K.Guntupalli,“Criticalillnessinpregnancy: an overview,”
  31. (2001). Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients,”
  32. (1998). Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near-miss,”
  33. (2006). Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works,”
  34. (2001). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, and outcome in critically ill obstetric patients treated in an
  35. (2004). The continuum of maternal morbidity and mortality: factors associated with severity,”
  36. (2004). The critically ill obstetric patient: what’s the score?”
  37. (1996). The SOFA (Sepsisrelated Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure,”IntensiveCareMedicine,vol.22,no.7,pp. 707–710,
  38. (2005). Transforming health systems to improve the lives of women and children,”
  39. (2000). U.Janssens,C.Graf,J.Grafetal.,“Evaluationofthesofascore: a single-center experience of a medical intensive care unit 303 consecutive patients with predominantly cardiovascular disorders,”
  40. (2002). V.Pettil¨ a,M.Pettil¨ a,S.Sarna,P.Voutilainen,andO.Takkunen, “Comparison of multiple organ dysfunction scores in the prediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill,”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.