Location of Repository

Antimicrobial Active Clothes Display No Adverse Effects on the Ecological Balance of the Healthy Human Skin Microflora

By Dirk Hoefer and Timo R. Hammer


The progressive public use of antimicrobial clothes has raised issues concerning skin health. A placebo-controlled side-to-side study was run with antimicrobial clothes versus fabrics of similar structure but minus the antimicrobial activity, to evaluate possible adverse effects on the healthy skin microflora. Sixty volunteers were enrolled. Each participant received a set of form-fitting T-shirts constructed in 2 halves: an antibacterial half, displaying activities of 3–5 log-step reductions due to silver-finishes or silver-loaded fibres and a nonantibacterial control side. The microflora of the scapular skin was analyzed weekly for opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms over six weeks. The antibacterial halves did not disturb the microflora in number or composition, whereas a silver-containing deodorant displayed a short-term disturbance. Furthermore, parameters of skin morphology and function (TEWL, pH, moisture) did not show any significant shifts. In summary, antimicrobial clothes did not show adverse effects on the ecological balance of the healthy skin microflora

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: International Scholarly Research Network
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3262534
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles



    1. (2008). A .D .L e u n g ,A .M .S c h i l t z ,C .F .H a l l ,a n dA .H .L i u ,“ S e v e r e atopic dermatitis is associated with a high burden of environmental Staphylococcus aureus,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy,
    2. (1965). A new method for the quantitative investigation of cutaneous bacteria,”
    3. (2001). An historical overview of the use of silver in wound management,”
    4. (2004). Antimicrobial textiles—an overview,”
    5. (2006). Antimicrobials and the skin physiological and pathological flora,”
    6. (1999). Bacterial resistance and topical antimicrobial wash products,”
    7. (2003). Bacterial silver resistance: molecular biology and uses and misuses of silver compounds,”
    8. (2007). Benno,“Characterizationof skinmicrobiotain patients with atopic dermatitis and in normal subjects using 16S rRNA gene-based comprehensive analysis,”
    9. (2003). C o l e ,R .M .A d d i s o n ,J .R .R u b i n oe ta l . ,“ I n v e s t i g a t i o n of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers,”
    10. (1985). C.Hauser,B.Wuethrich,andL.Matter,“Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization in atopic dermatitis patients,”
    11. (1998). Changes in bacterial flora associated with skin damage on hands of health care personnel,”
    12. (2000). Cunliffe ,a n dK .T .H o l l a n d ,“ T h e cutaneous microflora of adolescent, persistent and late-onset acne patients does not differ,”
    13. Effect of antimicrobial agents on the ecological balance of human microflora,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases,vol.
    14. (2006). Efficacy and functionality of silver-coated textiles in patients with atopic eczema,”
    15. (1987). Evaluation of a standard scrubbing method for the recovery of aerobic skin flora,”Annales del’InstitutPasteurMicrobiology,vol.138,no.3,
    16. (2006). Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of a special silk textile in the treatment of atopic dermatitis,”
    17. Fabric preferences of atopic dermatitispatients,”Dermatitis,vol.20,no.1,pp.29–33,2009.
    18. (2008). Fabrics for atopic dermatitis,”
    19. (2002). Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force.
    20. (2006). H i p l e r ,P .E l s n e r ,a n dJ .W .F l u h r ,“ A n t i f u n g a la n d antibacterial properties of a silver-loaded cellulosic fiber,”
    21. (1979). H.A.Lilly,E.J.L.Lowbury,andM.D.Wilkins,“Limitstoprogressive reduction of resident skin bacteria by disinfection,”
    22. (2006). Hygienic relevance and risk assessment of antimicrobial-impregnated textiles,”
    23. (2002). I: its antibacterial properties and mechanism of action,”
    24. (2006). Lansdown,“Silver in health care: antimicrobial effects and safety
    25. (1988). Microbial ecology of the skin,”
    26. (1989). Microbiology of the skin: resident flora, ecology, infection,”
    27. (2006). Molecular analysis of fungal microbiota in samples from healthy human skin and psoriatic lesions,”
    28. (2003). Occurrence of resistance to antibiotics,metals,andplasmidsinclinicalstrainsofStaphylococcus spp,”
    29. Preclinical evaluation of novel antibacterial agents by microbiological and molecular techniques,”Expert Opinion onInvestigationalDrugs,v ol.13,no .8,
    30. (2008). Recent advances in antimicrobial treatments of textiles,”
    31. (2008). Renaudet al.,“A diversity profileof the human skin microbiota,”
    32. (2007). Textiles—determination of antibacterial activity of antibacterial finished products,” ISO 20743:2007,
    33. (2009). The benefits of silver in hygiene, personal care and healthcare,”
    34. (2007). The increasing use of silver-based products as antimicrobial agents: a useful development or a cause for concern?”
    35. (1990). The influence of various factors on the human resident skin flora,”
    36. (2004). The vulvar skin microenvironment: influence of different panty liners on temperature, pH and micoroflora,”
    37. (2006). Use of textiles in atopic dermatitis: care of atopic dermatitis,”
    38. Williams,“How safe is silver in wound care?”JournalofWoundCare,vol.13,no.4,pp.131–136,2004.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.