Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys

By J. Scott Armstrong and Terry S. Overton

Abstract

Valid predictions for the direction of nonresponse bias were obtained from subjective estimates and extrapolations in an analysis of mail survey data from published studies. For estimates of the magnitude of bias, the use of extrapolations led to substantial improvements over a strategy of not using extrapolations

Topics: Behavioral Analysis
Year: 1977
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:5205
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://cogprints.org/5205/1/Es... (external link)
  • http://cogprints.org/5205/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1954). A case for-and-against mail questionnaires,” Public Opinion Quarterly,
    2. (1966). A note on nonresponse in a mail survey,"
    3. (1970). Armer, “The use of potential nonrespondents for studying nonresponse bias,”
    4. (1949). Bias in mail surveys cannot be controlled by one mailing,” Public Opinion Quarterly,
    5. (1959). Can the mail-back bias contribute to a study's validity?”
    6. (1973). Characteristics of willing and reluctant respondents,”
    7. (1947). Controlling bias in mail questionnaires,”
    8. (1971). Correcting non-response bias in mail questionnaires,”
    9. (1962). Differences between early and late respondents to a mailed survey,”
    10. (1943). Differences between persons responding and not responding to a mailed questionnaire,”
    11. (1975). Estimating bias due to nonresponse in mail surveys,”
    12. (1976). Exploring and correcting for nonresponse bias using follow-ups of nonrespondents,”
    13. (1939). Factors Influencing questionnaire returns from former university students,”
    14. (1964). How subject matter can bias a mail survey,” Media/Scope,
    15. (1960). Implications of nonresponse for the interpretation of mail questionnaire data,”
    16. (1969). Just how credible are your market estimates?”
    17. (1945). Mail questionnaire as a research problem,”
    18. (1946). Mail surveys can be valuable,”
    19. (1950). Methods of sampling for estimating peach production in North Carolina,” North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Technical
    20. (1975). Nonresponse in sociological surveys: A review of some methods for handling the problem,”
    21. (1939). Notes on the validity of mad questionnaire returns,”
    22. (1947). Objective differences among various types of respondents to a mailed questionnaire,”
    23. (1970). Professional Mail Surveys.
    24. (1966). Questionnaire-return bias in the study of blue-collar workers,”
    25. (1961). Research on mail surveys,”
    26. (1942). Respondents and non-respondents to mail questionnaires,”
    27. (1947). Response bias in a mail survey,”
    28. (1958). Sampling Opinions.
    29. (1967). Social science data archives: progress and prospects,”
    30. (1964). Socioeconomic status and familial variables in mail questionnaire responses,”
    31. (1962). Some personality differences between responders and nonresponders to a survey questionnaire,”
    32. (1975). Stimulating responses to mailed questionnaires:
    33. (1963). Tests of significance and partial returns to mail questionnaires,”
    34. (1940). The practical use of repeated questionnaire waves,”
    35. The problem of bias in mail returns
    36. (1972). The Sophisticated Poll Watcher's Guide.
    37. (1965). The volunteer subject,”
    38. (1974). Weighting to adjust for survey nonresponse,”
    39. (1940). Who answers questionnaires?”

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.