Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Unintelligible Management Research and Academic Prestige

By J. Scott Armstrong

Abstract

Modest support was found for the "Dr. Fox Phenomenon": Management scientists gain prestige by unintelligible writing. A positive correlation (+0.7) was found between the prestige of 10 management journals and their "fog indices" (reading difficulty). Furthermore, 32 faculty members were asked to rate the prestige of four passages from management journals. The content of the passages was held constant while readability was varied. Those passages that were more difficult to read were rated higher in research competence

Topics: Behavioral Analysis
Year: 1980
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:5203

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1948). A New Readability Yardstick,"
  2. (1973). An Analysis of the Readability of Selected Management Journals,"
  3. (1977). Cross-Shopping and Retail Growth,"
  4. (1978). Long-Range Forecasting: From Crystal Ball to Computer. Wiley-Interscience,
  5. (1977). Marketing Professional Services,"
  6. (1975). Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys,"
  7. (1978). Optimal Reneging Decisions in a G/M/1 Queue,"
  8. (1976). Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative, Ballinger,
  9. (1973). The Doctor Fox Lecture: A Paradigm of Educational Seduction,"
  10. (1979). Unintelligible Research and Academic Prestige: Further Adventures of Dr. Fox,"

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.