Article thumbnail

FEATURE TYPE EFFECTS IN SEMANTIC MEMORY: AN EVENT RELATED POTENTIALS STUDY

By Prof. Giuseppe Sartori, Dr. David Polezzi, Dr. Francesca Mameli and Dr. Luigi Lombardi

Abstract

It is believed that the N400 elicited by concepts belonging to Living is larger than N400 to Objects. This is considered as evidence that concepts are organized, in the brain, on the basis of categories. Similarly, differential N400 to sensory and non-sensory semantic features was taken as evidence for a neural organisation of conceptual memory based on semantic features. We conducted a feature-verification experiment where Living and Non-Living concepts are described by sensory and non-sensory features were matched for age-of-acquisition, typicality and familiarity and for relevance of semantic features. Relevance is a measure of the contribution of semantic features to the “core” meaning of a concept. We found that when Relevance is low then N400 is larger. In addition, we found that when the two categories of Living and Non-Living concepts are matched for relevance the seemingly category effect at the neural level disappeared. Also no difference between sensory and non-sensory descriptions was detected when relevance was matched. In sum, N400 does not differ between categories or feature types. Previously reported effects of semantic categories and feature type may have arisen as a consequence of the differing Relevance of concepts belonging to Living and Non-Living categories

Topics: Behavioral Neuroscience
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:5121

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A asis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowluropsychologia 37
  2. (1991). A computational model of semanory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category ty,
  3. (1999). A rose by any other name: long-term structure and sentence processing,
  4. (2005). Association of schizotypy with semanessing differences: an event-related brain potentials study, r. Res.
  5. (1999). Category specific semantic impairrain 107
  6. (1999). Dual-process model in semanng: a functional imaging perspective,
  7. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic use in language comprehension,
  8. (2001). Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in cognition: a critical review and meta-analysis,
  9. (2000). Naming time and standardms for the Italian PD/DPSS of 266 pictures: direct comwith American, English, French, and Spanish published s,
  10. (1996). Neural corf category-specific knowledge,
  11. (1998). ntic subsystem of visual attributes,
  12. (2001). Perceptual and semantic source of category-specific event-related potentials during picture and word categorizam.
  13. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potenect semantic incongruity,
  14. (1998). Sarto dicts nor 754–770 [21] S.L. Tho neural b edge, Ne [22] E.K. Wa ments,
  15. (2000). Semantic category discrimination and N400,
  16. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: structure and s,
  17. (2004). Semantic relevance and semantic disorders,
  18. (2005). Semantic relevance best premal and abnormal name retrieval,
  19. (1998). The effects tic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: tudy,
  20. (2000). The organization of semantic memory: in support of a ed model,