Article thumbnail

Accuracy in Copy Number Calling by qPCR and PRT: A Matter of DNA

By Nora Fernandez-Jimenez, Ainara Castellanos-Rubio, Leticia Plaza-Izurieta, Galder Gutierrez, Iñaki Irastorza, Luis Castaño, Juan Carlos Vitoria and Jose Ramon Bilbao


The possible implication of copy number variation (CNV) in the genetic susceptibility to human disease needs to be assessed using robust methods that can be applied at a population scale. In this report, we analyze the performance of the two major techniques, quantitative PCR (qPCR) and paralog ratio test (PRT), and investigate the influence of input DNA amount and template integrity on the reliability of both methods. Analysis of three genes (PRELID1, SYNPO and DEFB4) in a large sample set showed that both methods are prone to false copy number assignments if sufficient attention is not paid to DNA concentration and quality. Accurate normalization of samples is essential for reproducible qPCR because it avoids the effect of differential amplification efficiencies between target and control assays, whereas PRT is generally more sensitive to template degradation due to the fact that longer amplicons are usually needed to optimize sensitivity and specificity of paralog sequence PCR. The use of normalized, high quality genomic DNA yields comparable results with both methods

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). A chromosome 8 gene-cluster polymorphism with low human beta-defensin 2 gene copy number predisposes to Crohn disease of the colon.
  2. (2008). A new real-time PCR method to overcome significant quantitative inaccuracy due to slight amplification inhibition.
  3. (2007). Accurate, high-throughput typing of copy number variation using paralog ratios from dispersed repeats.
  4. (2010). Analysis of beta-defensin and Toll-like receptor gene copy number variation in celiac disease.
  5. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.
  6. (2010). Association of higher DEFB4 genomic copy number with Crohn’s disease.
  7. (2011). Betadefensin genomic copy number in different populations: a comparison of three methods.
  8. (2009). CCL3L1 and HIV/AIDS susceptibility.
  9. (2008). Combined functional and positional gene information for the identification of susceptibility variants in celiac disease.
  10. (2008). Copy number variation of beta-defensins and relevance to disease.
  11. (2006). Global variation in copy number in the human genome.
  12. (2010). Lower linkage disequilibrium at CNVs is due to both recurrent mutation and transposing duplications.
  13. (2010). Measurement methods and accuracy in copy number variation: failure to replicate associations of beta-defensin copy number with Crohn’s disease.
  14. (2005). Population structure, differential bias and genomic control in a large-scale, casecontrol association study.
  15. (2009). PRELI is a mitochondrial regulator of human primary T-helper cell apoptosis, STAT6, and Th2-cell differentiation.
  16. (2008). Psoriasis is associated with increased beta-defensin genomic copy number.
  17. (2010). Sajantila A
  18. (2007). Statistical significance of quantitative PCR.
  19. (2005). Synaptopodin regulates the actin-bundling activity of alpha-actinin in anisoform-specific manner.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.