(1981). A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.
(1985). A score system for evaluating random control clinical trials of prophylaxis of abdominal surgical wound infection.
(1990). Acupuncture and chronic pain: a criteria-based meta-analysis.
(2010). Analysis of Quality Standards Assessing Randomized Controlled Trials.
(2011). Applying the risk of bias tool in a systematic review of combination long-acting betaagonists and inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma.
(1995). Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.
(1996). Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: Current issues and future directions.
(1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?.
(2011). Assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in the field of dentistry indexed in the Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Cie ˆncias da Sau ´de) database. Sao Paulo Med
(2010). Assessment of risk of bias among pediatric randomized controlled trials.
(2010). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract;Available:
(2007). Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Traditional Chinese Medicine Published in Chinese Journals.
(2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
(1997). Components of a randomized clinical trial.
(1998). Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
(2011). eds (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
(2004). Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
(2005). Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors.
(1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.
Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.
(2007). Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.
(2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.
(2007). Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals.
(2009). Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.