Article thumbnail

Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey

By Willem De Keyzer, Inge Huybrechts, Veerle De Vriendt, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Nadia Slimani, Herman Van Oyen and Stefaan De Henauw
Topics: Original Article
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3215303
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). 24-hour dietary recall and food record methods.-Willett W, ed.Nutritional epidemiology, 2nd ed.
  2. (2002). A European food consumption survey method-conclusions and recommendations.
  3. (1996). A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions.
  4. (2000). and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake.
  5. (1995). BECEL nutrient calculation program: Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
  6. (2004). Belgian food composition table.
  7. (1998). Calibration of the computer science and applications,
  8. (1997). Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey.
  9. (2003). Comparison of commonly used procedures, including the doubly-labelled water technique, in the estimation of total energy expenditure of women with special reference to the significance of body fatness.
  10. (1994). Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records.
  11. (2008). comparison of four dietary assessment methods in materially deprived households in England. Public Health Nutr
  12. (2011). Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S498S516. Comparison of 24-h recalls and dietary records Citation: Food & Nutrition Research
  13. (2005). Database of trade names.
  14. (1997). Development of an approach for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions at the population level.
  15. (2001). Dutch food composition table. Zeist: NEVO foundation (in Dutch);
  16. (1995). EPICSOFT picture book for estimation of food portion sizes. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer;
  17. (2003). Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water. Sports Med
  18. (2002). Estimating the distribution of usual dietary intake by short-term measurements.
  19. (2000). Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip andwrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc
  20. (2002). Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in
  21. (2000). Field evaluation of the computer science and applications, Inc. physical activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc
  22. (2011). Food photographs in nutritional surveillance: errors in portion size estimation using drawings of bread and photographs of margarine and beverages consumption.
  23. (2002). Food Standards Agency (FSA). McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods. 6th summary ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry;
  24. (1995). Freedson PS. Validity of the computer science and applications,
  25. (1997). Household weights and measures. A manual for a standardised quantification of food items in Belgium. Brussels: Superior Health Counsil;
  26. (1997). Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys.
  27. (2009). Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice.
  28. (1998). Nature of variation
  29. (2002). Perspectives of using the EPIC-SOFT programme in the context of pan-European nutritional monitoring surveys: methodological and practical implications.
  30. (2007). Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity
  31. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research.
  32. (2002). Selection of methodology to assess food intake.
  33. (2002). Severe underreporting of energy intake in normal weight subjects: use of an appropriate standard and relation to restrained eating. Public Health Nutr
  34. Software for intake distribution estimation. 1997; version 1.02. Available from: http://cssm.ias tate.edu/software/cside.html
  35. (2000). Standardization of the 24-hour diet recall calibration method used in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results.
  36. (2006). Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory.
  37. (2007). study size and power.Margetts B,
  38. (2004). Table de Composition des Aliments. Bruxelles: Institut Paul Lambin;
  39. (2005). The Belgian food consumption survey: aims, design and methods. Arch Pub Health
  40. (2000). The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity.
  41. (2004). Underreporting of energy intake from a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire completed by adults in Montreal. Public Health Nutr
  42. (1995). Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers.
  43. (2000). Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.