(1996). A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between
(1994). A: Rationing critical care – what happens to patients who are not admitted? Theor Surg
(1996). Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference. Epidemiology
(1994). Angrist JD: Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica
(1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet
(1997). Bruining H: Organization of intensive care units in Europe: lessons from the EPIC study. Intensive Care Med
(2004). De Boer A: Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.
(2003). Econometric Analysis. 5 edition. Upper Saddle River,
(1998). Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables. Annu Rev Public Health
(2000). Elbourne DR: Randomized trials or observational tribulations?
(2001). Estimations of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: simple strategies for empirical pratice.
(2001). et al: Compliance with triage to intensive care recommendations. Crit Care Med
(1993). F: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. Jama
(2008). Grootendorst P: Use of instrumental variables in the analysis of generalized linear models in the presence of unmeasured confounding with applications to epidemiological research. Stat Med
(2000). Horwitz RI: Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
(1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables.
(1997). Instrumental variable estimation of count data models: application to models of cigarette smoking behaviour. Review of Economics and Statistics
(1997). Instrumental variables for logistic regression: an illustration. Soc Sci Res
(2009). Instrumental variables I: instrumental variables exploit natural variation in nonexperimental data to estimate causal relationships.
(2009). Instrumental variables II: instrumental variable application-in 25 variations, the physician prescribing preference generally was strong and reduced covariate imbalance.
(1998). Intensive care training and specialty status in Europe: international comparisons. Task Force on Educational issues of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med
(2001). JC: Effectiveness of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer in the elderly: instrumental variable and propensity analysis.
(1994). JP: Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables. Jama
(1984). Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.
(2006). Klungel OH: Instrumental variables: application and limitations. Epidemiology
(2009). MA: Instrumental variable analysis for estimation of treatment effects with dichotomous outcomes.
(2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology
(1995). Measuring effects without randomized trials? Options, problems, challenges. Med Care
(2007). Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
(2007). MJ: Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. Jama
(2004). Model selection, confounder control, and marginal structural models: review and new applications. The American Statistician
(1997). Mortality among appropriately referred patients refused admission to intensive-care units. Lancet
(2002). Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat–which of these should we use? Value Health
(2007). Preference-based instrumental variable methods for the estimation of treatment effects: assessing validity and interpreting results.
(1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak.
Propensity scores in intensive care and anaesthesiology literature: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med .
(2010). Reasons for refusal of admission to intensive care and impact on mortality. Intensive Care Med
(2006). Robins JM: Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist’s dream? Epidemiology
(2010). Schneeweiss S: Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
(2006). Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med
(1997). Silva JMCS: Endogeneity in count data models:an application to demand for health care.
(1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika
(2007). The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios. Stat Med
(2010). The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies. Stat Med
(2009). The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Making
(1980). The Theory and Pratice of Econometrics.
(1998). The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. Bmj
(1996). Thijs LG: The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med
Tibshirani R: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca
(2003). Triaging patients to the ICU: a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes. Intensive Care Med