Article thumbnail

Genome-Wide Analysis of Heteroduplex DNA in Mismatch Repair–Deficient Yeast Cells Reveals Novel Properties of Meiotic Recombination Pathways

By Emmanuelle Martini, Valérie Borde, Matthieu Legendre, Stéphane Audic, Béatrice Regnault, Guillaume Soubigou, Bernard Dujon and Bertrand Llorente

Abstract

Meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate crossover (CO) recombination, which is necessary for accurate chromosome segregation, but DSBs may also repair as non-crossovers (NCOs). Multiple recombination pathways with specific intermediates are expected to lead to COs and NCOs. We revisited the mechanisms of meiotic DSB repair and the regulation of CO formation, by conducting a genome-wide analysis of strand-transfer intermediates associated with recombination events. We performed this analysis in a SK1 × S288C Saccharomyces cerevisiae hybrid lacking the mismatch repair (MMR) protein Msh2, to allow efficient detection of heteroduplex DNAs (hDNAs). First, we observed that the anti-recombinogenic activity of MMR is responsible for a 20% drop in CO number, suggesting that in MMR–proficient cells some DSBs are repaired using the sister chromatid as a template when polymorphisms are present. Second, we observed that a large fraction of NCOs were associated with trans–hDNA tracts constrained to a single chromatid. This unexpected finding is compatible with dissolution of double Holliday junctions (dHJs) during repair, and it suggests the existence of a novel control point for CO formation at the level of the dHJ intermediate, in addition to the previously described control point before the dHJ formation step. Finally, we observed that COs are associated with complex hDNA patterns, confirming that the canonical double-strand break repair model is not sufficient to explain the formation of most COs. We propose that multiple factors contribute to the complexity of recombination intermediates. These factors include repair of nicks and double-stranded gaps, template switches between non-sister and sister chromatids, and HJ branch migration. Finally, the good correlation between the strand transfer properties observed in the absence of and in the presence of Msh2 suggests that the intermediates detected in the absence of Msh2 reflect normal intermediates

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3183076
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1975). A general model for genetic recombination.
  2. (2011). A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation.
  3. (1964). A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi.
  4. (1993). A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  5. (1996). A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  6. (1997). An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination.
  7. (2004). Antiviral protein Ski8 is a direct partner of Spo11 in meiotic DNA break formation, independent of its cytoplasmic role in RNA metabolism.
  8. (2009). Array-based genotyping in S. cerevisiae using semi-supervised clustering.
  9. (2007). BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules.
  10. (1974). Carbohydrate metabolism during ascospore development in yeast.
  11. (2009). Characterization of meiotic crossovers and gene conversion by whole-genome sequencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  12. (2003). Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet.
  13. Colaiacovo MP (2009) Distribution of meiotic recombination events: talking to your neighbors.
  14. (2004). Competing crossover pathways act during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  15. (2009). Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  16. (2006). Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis.
  17. (2004). Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis.
  18. (2003). crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast.
  19. (2001). Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis.
  20. (1998). Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome.
  21. (1997). Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast.
  22. (2004). Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis.
  23. (1984). Effect of mismatched base pairs on the fate of donor DNA in transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
  24. (1994). Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair.
  25. (2005). Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks.
  26. (2000). Evidence for short-patch mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  27. (2007). Evolution of models of homologous recombination.
  28. (1991). Extensive 39-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site.
  29. (2010). Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis.
  30. (1986). Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center.
  31. (2003). Generating crossovers by resolution of nicked Holliday junctions: a role for Mus81-Eme1 in meiosis.
  32. (1997). Genetic and physical maps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  33. (2007). Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789.
  34. (2006). Genome-wide detection of polymorphisms at nucleotide resolution with a single DNA microarray.
  35. (2011). Genome-wide survey of post-meiotic segregation during yeast recombination.
  36. (2008). Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape.
  37. (1986). Heteroduplex deoxyribonucleic acid base mismatch repair in bacteria.
  38. (2008). Highresolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast.
  39. (1983). Homologous association of chromosomal DNA during yeast meiosis.
  40. (1995). Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination.
  41. (2005). Infrequent co-conversion of markers flanking a meiotic recombination initiation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  42. (1994). Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  43. (2001). Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA.
  44. (2003). LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA.
  45. (2007). Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  46. (1981). Marker effects and the nature of the recombination event at the his 1 locus of Saccharomices cerevisiae.
  47. (1997). Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family.
  48. (2006). Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of Sgs1.
  49. (1999). Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function.
  50. (1985). Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2.
  51. (2007). Meiotic recombination in Drosophila Msh6 mutants yields discontinuous gene conversion tracts.
  52. (2007). Meiotic Recombination. In: Topics in Current Genetics, Molecular Genetics of Recombination,
  53. (1985). Mismatch-specific post-meiotic segregation frequency in yeast suggests a heteroduplex recombination intermediate.
  54. (2005). MLH1 and MSH2 promote the symmetry of double-strand break repair events at the HIS4 hotspot in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  55. (1997). Mlh1 is unique among mismatch repair proteins in its ability to promote crossing-over during meiosis.
  56. (1997). Molecular keys to speciation: DNA polymorphism and the control of genetic exchange in enterobacteria.
  57. (1999). Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  58. (2006). Negative epistasis between natural variants of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH1 and PMS1 genes results in a defect in mismatch repair.
  59. (2003). Patterns of heteroduplex formation associated with the initiation of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  60. (2009). Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts.
  61. (2011). Processing of joint molecule intermediates by structure-selective endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes.
  62. (2001). Recombination events in Neurospora crassa may cross a translocation breakpoint by a template-switching mechanism.
  63. (1996). Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model.
  64. (2008). RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination.
  65. (2010). Rmi1 stimulates decatenation of double Holliday junctions during dissolution by Sgs1-Top3. Nat Struct Mol Biol.
  66. (2000). Roles for mismatch repair factors in regulating genetic recombination.
  67. (2006). Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination.
  68. (2010). Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination.
  69. (1994). Structure of recombinants from conjugational crosses between Escherichia coli donor and mismatch-repair deficient Salmonella typhimurium recipients. Genetics 136: 17–26. Global Meiotic Recombination Intermediates Study PLoS Genetics |
  70. (2003). Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination.
  71. (2007). Synthesis-dependent strand annealing in meiosis.
  72. (2007). Template switching during breakinduced replication.
  73. (2008). The Arabidopsis BLAP75/Rmi1 homologue plays crucial roles in meiotic doublestrand break repair.
  74. (2010). The baker’s yeast diploid genome is remarkably stable in vegetative growth and meiosis.
  75. (2003). The Bloom’s syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination.
  76. (1999). The conversion gradient at HIS4 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. A role for mismatch repair directed by biased resolution of the recombinational intermediate.
  77. (1983). The double-strandbreak repair model for recombination.
  78. (2003). The endogenous Mus81-Eme1 complex resolves Holliday junctions by a nick and counternick mechanism.
  79. (1996). The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid.
  80. (2003). The Mus81/ Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast.
  81. (1987). The role of heteroduplex correction in gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  82. (1999). The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast.
  83. (2000). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 mismatch repair protein localizes to recombination intermediates in vivo.
  84. (2003). The Sgs1 helicase regulates chromosome synapsis and meiotic crossing over.
  85. (2001). The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination.
  86. (2008). Topoisomerase 3alpha and RMI1 suppress somatic crossovers and are essential for resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates in Arabidopsis thaliana.
  87. (2005). Trans events associated with crossovers are revealed in the absence of mismatch repair genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  88. (2007). ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work.