Article thumbnail

Nuclear Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells: Epigenetic Contribution

By Massimo De Felici

Abstract

The unique capability of germ cells to give rise to a new organism, allowing the transmission of primary genetic information from generation to generation, depends on their epigenetic reprogramming ability and underlying genomic totipotency. Recent studies have shown that genome-wide epigenetic modifications, referred to as “epigenetic reprogramming”, occur during the development of the gamete precursors termed primordial germ cells (PGCs) in the embryo. This reprogramming is likely to be critical for the germ line development itself and necessary to erase the parental imprinting and setting the base for totipotency intrinsic to this cell lineage. The status of genome acquired during reprogramming and the associated expression of key pluripotency genes render PGCs susceptible to transform into pluripotent stem cells. This may occur in vivo under still undefined condition, and it is likely at the origin of the formation of germ cell tumors. The phenomenon appears to be reproduced under partly defined in vitro culture conditions, when PGCs are transformed into embryonic germ (EG) cells. In the present paper, I will try to summarize the contribution that epigenetic modifications give to nuclear reprogramming in mouse PGCs

Topics: Review Article
Publisher: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3182379
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). A .M e i s s n e r ,T .S .M i k k e l s e n ,H .G ue ta l . ,“ G e n o m e - s c a l e DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells,”
  2. (2006). A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells,”
  3. (2007). A histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase regulates animal posterior development,”
  4. (2008). a i ,I .J .H u g g i n s ,S .R .J a m e s ,A .R .K a r p f ,D .A .J o n e s
  5. (2002). A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice,”
  6. (2008). a r a n t z a l i ,H .S c h u l z ,O .H u m m e l ,N .H u b n e r ,A .K .H a t -zopoulos, and A. Kretsovali, “Histone deacetylase inhibition accelerates the early events of stem cell differentiation: transcriptomic and epigenetic analysis,”
  7. (2006). a t o ,M .K o n d o ,a n dK . - I .A r a i ,“ T h eo r p h a nn u c l e a r receptor
  8. (2010). Active DNA demethylation: many r o a d sl e a dt oR o m e ,
  9. (2003). Akt/PTEN signaling mediatesestrogen-dependentproliferationofprimordialgermcells in vitro,”
  10. (2005). Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice,”
  11. (2001). Cell and tissue requirements for the gene eed during mouse gastrulation and organogenesis,”
  12. (2007). Cellular dynamics associated with the genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming in migrating primordial germ cells
  13. (2007). Characterization of DNA methylation change in stem cell marker genes during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells,”
  14. (2008). Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line,”
  15. (2007). Chromatin remodeling and cancer, part II: ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling,”
  16. (2006). Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines,”
  17. (2008). Complex genome-wide transcription dynamics orchestrated by Blimp1 for the specification of the germ cell lineage
  18. (2003). Conditional loss of PTEN leads to testicular teratoma and enhances embryonic germ cell production,”
  19. (2003). Continuing primordial germcelldifferentiationinthemouseembryoisacell-intrinsic program sensitive to
  20. (2006). Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells,”
  21. (2008). Coordinated regulation of transcriptional repression by the
  22. Demethylating agent, 5-azacytidine, reverses differentiation of embryonic stem cells,”
  23. (2007). Demethylation of H3K27 regulates polycomb recruitment and H2A ubiquitination,”
  24. (1992). Derivation of pluripotential embryonic stem cells from murine primordial germ cells in culture,”
  25. (2006). Differential recruitment of methylated CpG binding domains by the orphan receptor GCNF initiates the repression and silencing of
  26. (2006). DNA methylation is a primary mechanism for silencing postmigratory primordial germ cell genes in both germ cell and somatic cell lineages,”
  27. (2006). e s h o r e ra n dT .M i s t e l i ,“ C h r o m a t i ni np l u r i p o t e n t embryonic stem cells and differentiation,”
  28. (2007). Early loss of Xist RNA expression and inactive X chromosome associated chromatin modification in developing primordial germ cells,”
  29. (2010). Embryonic germ cells from mice and rats exhibit properties consistent with a generic pluripotent ground state,”
  30. (2004). Epigenetic control of mouse Oct-4 gene expression in embryonic stem cells and trophoblast stem cells,”
  31. (2002). Epigenetic marks by DNA methylation specific to stem, germ and somatic cells
  32. (2010). Epigenetic profiles in primordial germ cells: global modulation and fine tuning of the epigenome for acquisition of totipotency,”
  33. (2002). Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells,”
  34. (2010). Epigenetic rprogramming of mouse germ cells toward totipotency,”
  35. (2009). Epigenetics: poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of PARP-1 regulates genomic methylation patterns,”
  36. (1998). Epigenotype switching of imprintable loci
  37. (2010). Establishing, maintaining and modifyingDNAmethylationpatternsinplantsandanimals,”
  38. (2005). Expression of Stat3 in germ cells of developing and adult mouse ovaries and testes,”
  39. (2005). Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genomewide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice,”
  40. (2006). Fang et al., “G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis,”
  41. (2009). Foetal germ cells: striking the balance between pluripotency and differentiation,”
  42. (1996). Functional requirement of gp130-mediated signaling for growth and survival of mouse primordial germ cells in vitro and derivation of embryonic germ (EG) cells,”
  43. (2007). G u e n t h e r ,S .S .L e v i n e ,L .A .B o y e r ,R .J a e n i s c h ,a n d
  44. (2006). Gene expression dynamics during germline specification in mice identified by quantitative single-cell gene expression profiling,”
  45. (2007). Generation of functional multipotent adult stem cells from GPR125+ germline progenitors,”
  46. (2007). Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells,”
  47. (2004). Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis,”
  48. (2007). Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency,”
  49. (2009). Genome integrity: linking pluripotency and tumorgenicity,”
  50. Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins,”
  51. (2010). Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected byAIDdeficiency,”Nature,vol.463,no.7284,pp.1101–1105,
  52. (2007). Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells,”
  53. (2010). Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway,”
  54. (2010). Genomic imprinting mechanisms in embryonic and extraembryonic mouse tissues,”
  55. (2009). Genomic imprinting: employing and avoiding epigenetic processes,”
  56. (2007). Germ cell specification in mice,”
  57. (2001). Germ cells and pluripotent stem cells in the mouse,”
  58. (2005). Global hypomethylation of the genome in XX embryonic stem cells,”
  59. (2008). Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes,”
  60. (2008). H a n s e n ,A .P .B r a c k e n ,D .P a s i n ie ta l .
  61. (2007). Hata et al., “Role of the Dnmt3 family indenovomethylationofimprintedandrepetitivesequences during male germ cell development in the mouse,”
  62. (2008). Heterogeneity in imprinted methylation patterns of pluripotent embryonic germ cells derived from premig-ratory mouse germ cells,”
  63. (2005). How is the mouse germcell lineage established?”Differentiation,
  64. (1990). i n s b u r g ,M .H .L .S n o w ,a n dA .M c L a r e n ,“ P r i m o r d i a l germ cells in the mouse embryo during gastrulation,”
  65. (2009). In or out stemness: comparing growth factor signalling in mouse embryonic stem cells and primordial germ cells,”
  66. (2007). In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state,”
  67. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors,”
  68. (1997). K .H e r z i n g ,J .T .R o m e r ,J .M .H o r n ,a n dA .A s h w o r t h , “Xist has properties of the X-chromosome inactivation centre,”
  69. (2008). K.Hayashi,S.M.Lopes,F.Tang,andM.A.Surani,“Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states,”
  70. (2008). Kurimoto et al., “Critical function of Prdm14 for the establishment of the germ cell lineage in mice,”
  71. (2006). L.A.Boyer,K.Plath,J.Zeitlingeretal.,“Polycombcomplexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells,”
  72. (2008). Lineage-specific Polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors,”
  73. (2007). M c C o o l ,X .X u ,D .B .S i n g e r ,F .E .M u r d o c h ,a n dM .K . Fritsch, “The role of histone acetylation in regulating early gene expression patterns during early embryonic stem cell differentiation,”
  74. (2004). M o r g a n ,W .D e a n ,H .A .C o k e r ,W .R e i k ,a n dS .
  75. (2008). Mouse germ cell development during embryogenesis,”
  76. (2009). Myc-regulated microRNAs attenuate embryonic stem cell differentiation,”
  77. (2007). N.Maherali,R.Sridharan,W.Xieetal.,“Directlyreprogrammedfibroblastsshowglobalepigeneticremodelingandwidespread tissue contribution,” Cell Stem Cell,v o l .1 ,n o .1 ,p p .
  78. (2010). N.Z.Saraiva,C.S.Oliveira,andJ.M.Garcia,“Histoneacetylation and its role in embryonic stem cell differentiation,”
  79. (2007). Nishino et al., “Epigenetic regulation of Nanog gene in embryonic stem and trophoblast stem cells,” Genes to Cells,
  80. (1987). o n k ,M .B o u b e l i k ,a n dS .L e h n e r t ,“ T e m p o r a la n d regional changes
  81. (2009). Ohno et al., “Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks,”
  82. (2002). Opening of compacted chromatin by early developmental transcription factors
  83. (2006). Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis,”
  84. (2010). Polycomb complexes act redundantly to repress genomic repeats and genes,”
  85. (2008). Polycomb repressive complex 2 is dispensable for maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency,”
  86. (2009). Primordial germ cell biology at the beginning of the XXI
  87. (1981). Proliferation and migration of primordial germ cells during compensatory growth in mouse embryos,”
  88. (2008). Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with
  89. (2008). Reprogramming primordial germ cells into pluripotent stem cells,”
  90. (2003). Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse,”
  91. (2003). Roefs et al., “Rnf2 (Ring1b) deficiency causes gastrulation arrest and cell cycle inhibition,”
  92. (2008). Safeguarding parental identity:Dnmt1maintainsimprintsduringepigeneticreprogramming in early embryogenesis,”
  93. (2006). siRNA and DNA methylation do a two-step to silence tandem sequences,”
  94. (2004). Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity,”
  95. (2008). T.Latham,N.Gilbert,andB.Ramsahoye,“DNAmethylation in mouse embryonic stem cells and development,”
  96. (2008). The cell biology of DNA methylation in mammals,”
  97. (1974). The development of teratomas from parthenogenetically activated ovarian mouse eggs,”
  98. (2005). The diverse functions of histone lysine methylation,”
  99. (2008). The ground state of embryonicstemcellself-renewal,”Nature,vol.453,no.7194,pp. 519–523,
  100. (2010). The PARP side of the nucleus: molecular actions, physiological outcomes, and clinical targets,”
  101. (2007). The polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation,”
  102. (2001). The polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development,”
  103. (2006). The role of exogenous fibroblast growth factor-2 on the reprogramming of primordial germ cells into pluripotent stem cells,”
  104. (2006). The stabilization of β-catenin leads to impaired primordial germ cell development via aberrant cell cycle progression,”
  105. (2005). Transcriptional gene silencing by shortinterferingRNAs,”CurrentOpinioninMolecularTherapeutics,
  106. (2005). Tsix silences Xist through modification of chromatin structure,”
  107. (2003). Turning germ cells into stem cells,”
  108. (2007). Umehara et al., “PGC7/Stella protectsagainstDNAdemethylationinearlyembryogenesis,”
  109. (2007). X chromosome reactivation initiates in nascent primordial germ cells in mice,”
  110. (2008). Yamano et al., “AKT signaling promotes derivation of embryonic germ cells from primordial germ cells,”
  111. (2003). Zvetkova et al., “Establishment of histone H3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of