Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)

By Ben F.M. Wijnen, Ghislaine Mastrigt, Ken Redekop, H. Majoie, R. De Kinderen and Silvia Evers

Abstract

textabstractIntroduction: This article is part of the series “How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions” in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed. Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE. Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use

Topics: clinical practice guidelines, data-extraction, economic evaluations, quality appraisal, risk of bias, Systematic reviews
Year: 2016
DOI identifier: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961
OAI identifier:
Provided by: NARCIS
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 (external link)
  • http://repub.eur.nl/oai (external link)
  • http://hdl.handle.net/1765/944... (external link)
  • http://hdl.handle.net/1765/944... (external link)
  • http://repub.eur.nl/pub/94466/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.