Article thumbnail

Assessing socioeconomic health care utilization inequity in Israel: impact of alternative approaches to morbidity adjustment

By Efrat Shadmi, Ran D Balicer, Karen Kinder, Chad Abrams and Jonathan P Weiner
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3171367
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). AJ: Health care resource utilization in adults with congenital heart disease.
  2. (1991). Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management. Health Serv Res
  3. (2009). Asada Y: Need-based resource allocation: different need indicators, different results? BMC Health Serv Res
  4. (2002). Assessing population health care need using a claims-based ACG morbidity measure: a validation analysis in the Province of Manitoba. Health Serv Res
  5. (2006). Co-payments for physician visits: how large is the burden and who bears the brunt? Jerusalem: Myers-JDCBrookdale Institute, The Smokler Center for Health Policy Research;
  6. (1987). CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
  7. (1998). Diabetes in the African-American Medicare population. Morbidity, quality of care, and resource utilization. Diabetes Care
  8. (2001). Diffusion, utilization and regional variations
  9. (2005). DN: Self-reported health as a cultural health determinant in Arab and Jewish Israelis MABAT-National Health and Nutrition Survey 1999-2001. Soc Sci Med
  10. (2001). Do factors other than need determine utilization of physicians’ services in Ontario? CMAJ
  11. (2000). et al: Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US.
  12. (1998). Evaluating the Israeli health care reform: strategies, challenges and lessons. Health Policy
  13. (2000). Fundamentals of Biostatistics
  14. (2003). Hilbe JM: Generalized Estimaing Equations Boca
  15. (2008). Huang TP: Explanatory ability of the ACG system regarding the utilization and expenditure of the national health insurance population in Taiwan-a 5 year analysis. J Chin Med Assoc
  16. (1999). I: Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators. J Fam Pract
  17. (2006). Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ
  18. (2005). Inequity and inequality in the use of health care in England: an empirical investigation. Soc Sci Med
  19. (2003). Israeli Bureau of Statistics: Characterization and Classification of Local Authorities by the Socio-Economic Level of the Population.
  20. (2001). JP: Use of risk adjustment in setting budgets and measuring performance in primary care I: how it works. BMJ
  21. (2007). Kephart G: Equity in health services use and intensity of use in Canada. BMC Health Serv Res
  22. (2009). Kop Y: Allocation of resources for social services 2008 Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel;
  23. (2006). LA: The importance of comorbidity in analysing patient costs in Swedish primary care. BMC Public Health
  24. (2000). Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression
  25. (2002). Luepke LJ: Geriatric depression, antidepressant treatment, and healthcare utilization in a health maintenance organization.
  26. (2000). Mackenbach JP: Socioeconomic differences in self-assessed health in a chronically ill population: the role of different health aspects.
  27. (2001). MM: Inequities in access to medical care in five countries: findings from the
  28. (2007). MS: Inequalities in use of health services among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Health Serv Res
  29. (2011). O: Reducing health disparities in low socioeconomic and minority populations: strategy planning and implementation in Israel’s largest health care organization. Health Serv Res
  30. (2003). Oyen H: Socio-economic differences in the utilization of health services in Belgium. Health Policy
  31. (2002). Patient based ‘burden-of-illness’ in Swedish primary health care. Applying the Johns Hopkins ACG case-mix system in a retrospective study of electronic patient records.
  32. (1999). Pedrero E: Application of the ambulatory care groups in the primary care of a European national health care system: does it work? Med Care
  33. (2001). Peterburg Y: Prevalence of selected chronic diseases in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J
  34. (2008). Raskin-Segal A: Quality indicators for community health care in Israel, public report: 2005-2007. Jerusalem: Ministry of Health;
  35. (2010). Regev-Rosenberg S: Towards a more equitable distribution of resources and assessment of quality of care: validation of a comorbidity based case-mix system. Harefuah
  36. (2010). RH: Risk adjustment using administrative data-based and survey-derived methods for explaining physician utilization. Med Care
  37. (1992). RN: Johns Hopkins Ambulatory Care Groups (ACGs). A case-mix system for UR, QA and capitation adjustment. HMO Pract
  38. (1997). Socio-economic status and visits to physicians by adults in Ontario,
  39. (2008). Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care. BMC Health Serv Res
  40. (2007). StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station,
  41. (1990). The black report on socioeconomic inequalities in health ten years on. BMJ
  42. (2007). The Johns Hopkins University: The Johns Hopkins University ACG Case Mix Adjustment System. Documentation
  43. (2009). The relationship between effectiveness and costs measured by a risk-adjusted case-mix system: multicentre study of Catalonian population data bases. BMC Public Health
  44. (2000). Using diagnoses to describe populations and predict costs. Health Care Financ Rev
  45. (2005). WD: Socioeconomic status and the utilization of diagnostic imaging in an urban setting. CMAJ