Article thumbnail

Use of administrative hospital registry data and a civil registry to measure survival and other outcomes after cancer

By Henrik Toft Sørensen and Timothy L Lash
Topics: Editorial
Publisher: Dove Medical Press
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3168248
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. Cancer survivorship: a new challenge in delivering quality cancer care.
  2. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group.
  3. (1995). Comorbidity and survival of Danish breast cancer patients from
  4. Danish nationwide cohort study of postoperative death in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing hernia repair.
  5. (1999). Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press;
  6. (2011). Preadmission betablocker use and 30-day mortality among patients in intensive care: a cohort study. Crit Care.
  7. (1998). Predictors and patterns of red blood cell transfusion use among newly diagnosed cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia in
  8. Quality assurance in surgical oncology. Colorectal cancer as an example.
  9. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement and receiving routine thromboprophylaxis.
  10. (1999). Skeletal related events, bone metastasis and survival of prostate cancer: a population based cohort study in Denmark
  11. System changes to improve patient safety.
  12. (1997). The Danish Cancer Registry – history, content. Dan Med Bull.