Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The ontology of signs as linguistic and non-linguistic entities: a cognitive perspective

By Prof. A.V. Kravchenko

Abstract

It is argued that the traditional philosophical/linguistic analysis of semiotic phe-nomena is based on the false epistemological assumption that linguistic and non-linguistic entities possess different ontologies. An attempt is made to show where linguistics as the study of signs went wrong, and an unorthodox account of the na-ture of semiosis is proposed in the framework of autopoiesis as a new epistemology of the living

Topics: Philosophy of Language, Pragmatics, Epistemology
Publisher: John Benjamins
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:4009
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://cogprints.org/4009/1/On... (external link)
  • http://cogprints.org/4009/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2000). Applicability of cognitive grammar as a foundation of pedagogical/reference grammar. Lódz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lódzkiego.
    2. (1998). Beyond grammar: An experience-based theory of language.
    3. (1998). Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics.
    4. de (1916/1922). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot & Cie.
    5. (1996). Kinds of minds.
    6. (1990). Language & species. Chicago & London:
    7. (1998). Linguistic evidence and mental representations.
    8. (1990). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication.
    9. (1999). Samosoznanije lingvistiki — vchera i zavtra. Izvestija akademii nauk. Serija literatury i jazyka,
    10. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language.
    11. (1994). Some theoretical principles of cognitive linguistics and their application to the study of the semantics of verbal tenses. Studia Kognitywne 1. Semantyka kategorii aspektu i czasu.
    12. Usage-based models of language.
    13. (1992). What is a theory of mental representation? doi
    14. (1998). What linguistics can and can’t tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.