Article thumbnail

Genome-Scale Analysis of Translation Elongation with a Ribosome Flow Model

By Shlomi Reuveni, Isaac Meilijson, Martin Kupiec, Eytan Ruppin and Tamir Tuller


We describe the first large scale analysis of gene translation that is based on a model that takes into account the physical and dynamical nature of this process. The Ribosomal Flow Model (RFM) predicts fundamental features of the translation process, including translation rates, protein abundance levels, ribosomal densities and the relation between all these variables, better than alternative (‘non-physical’) approaches. In addition, we show that the RFM can be used for accurate inference of various other quantities including genes' initiation rates and translation costs. These quantities could not be inferred by previous predictors. We find that increasing the number of available ribosomes (or equivalently the initiation rate) increases the genomic translation rate and the mean ribosome density only up to a certain point, beyond which both saturate. Strikingly, assuming that the translation system is tuned to work at the pre-saturation point maximizes the predictive power of the model with respect to experimental data. This result suggests that in all organisms that were analyzed (from bacteria to Human), the global initiation rate is optimized to attain the pre-saturation point. The fact that similar results were not observed for heterologous genes indicates that this feature is under selection. Remarkably, the gap between the performance of the RFM and alternative predictors is strikingly large in the case of heterologous genes, testifying to the model's promising biotechnological value in predicting the abundance of heterologous proteins before expressing them in the desired host

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes.
  2. (2010). A role for codon order in translation dynamics.
  3. (2007). Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation.
  4. (2010). An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation.
  5. (1999). Analysis of base-pairing potentials between 16S rRNA and 59 UTR for translation initiation in various prokaryotes.
  6. (1994). Clustering of low usage codons and ribosome movement.
  7. (2009). Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli.
  8. (2004). Codon bias and heterologous protein expression.
  9. (2006). Codon modification of T cell receptors allows enhanced functional expression in transgenic human T cells.
  10. (2008). Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: A multi-gene study.
  11. (2007). Comparative proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
  12. (2008). Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast.
  13. (2009). Design parameters to control synthetic gene expression in Escherichia coli.
  14. (2007). Determinants of protein abundance and translation efficiency in S.
  15. (1992). Di Donato A
  16. (2007). Differential translation efficiency of orthologous genes is involved in phenotypic divergence of yeast species.
  17. (2011). Distribution of dwell times of a ribosome: effects of infidelity, kinetic proofreading and ribosome crowding.
  18. (2005). Dynamic correlation functions and Boltzmann-Langevin approach for driven one-dimensional lattice gas.
  19. (1997). Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale.
  20. (2004). Exploring the regulation of tRNA distribution on the genomic scale.
  21. (2009). Generic algorithm to predict the speed of translational elongation: implications for protein biogenesis.
  22. (2003). Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  23. (2009). Genomewide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling.
  24. (2003). Global analysis of protein expression in yeast.
  25. (2010). GroEL dependency affects codon usage–support for a critical role of misfolding in gene evolution.
  26. (2010). How the sequence of a gene can tune its translation.
  27. (1968). Kinetics of biopolymerization on nucleic acid templates.
  28. (1990). Kluyveromyces as a host for heterologous gene expression: expression and secretion of prochymosin.
  29. (1980). Mathematical modelling of translation of mRNA in eucaryotes; steady state, time-dependent processes and application to reticulocytes.
  30. (2008). Mistranslation-Induced Protein Misfolding as a Dominant Constraint on Coding-Sequence Evolution.
  31. (2005). mRNA sequence features that contribute to translational regulation in Arabidopsis.
  32. (2007). Optimal encoding rules for synthetic genes: the need for a community effort.
  33. (2002). Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay.
  34. (2010). Quality control by a mobile molecular workshop: quality versus quantity.
  35. (2010). Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells.
  36. (2010). Realtime tRNA transit on single translating ribosomes at codon resolution.
  37. (2005). Recent developments towards the heterologous expression of complex bacterial natural product biosynthetic pathways.
  38. (2005). Relative predicted protein levels of functionally associated proteins are conserved across organisms.
  39. (2007). Ribosome biogenesis and the translation process in Escherichia coli.
  40. (2004). Selective and mutational patterns associated with gene expression in humans: influences on synonymous composition and intron presence.
  41. (2010). Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line.
  42. (2007). SGDB: a database of synthetic genes re-designed for optimizing protein over-expression.
  43. (2006). Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise.
  44. (2008). Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast.
  45. (2004). Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection.
  46. (1987). The codon Adaptation Index–a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.
  47. (2000). The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 A resolution.
  48. (1999). The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast.
  49. (2006). The geometry of the ribosomal polypeptide exit tunnel.
  50. (1995). The Jackknife and Bootstrap.
  51. (1999). The positive relationship between codon usage bias and translation initiation AUG context in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  52. (2011). The Ribosome Flow Model PLoS Computational Biology |
  53. (2006). Tissue-Specific Differences in Human Transfer RNA Expression.
  54. (2003). Totally asymmetric exclusion process with extended objects: a model for protein synthesis.
  55. (2009). TP53 cancerous mutations exhibit selection for translation efficiency.
  56. (2007). Traffic of interacting ribosomes: effects of singlemachine mechanochemistry on protein synthesis.
  57. (2009). Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding.
  58. (2008). Transient transcriptional responses to stress are generated by opposing effects of mRNA production and degradation.
  59. (2010). Translation efficiency in humans: tissue specificity, global optimization and differences between developmental stages.
  60. (2010). Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy.
  61. (2009). Viral adaptation to host: a proteome-based analysis of codon usage and amino acid preferences.
  62. (2006). Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.
  63. (2009). You’re one in a googol: optimizing genes for protein expression.