Article thumbnail

Development of a practical tool to measure the impact of publications on the society based on focus group discussions with scientists

By Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Thomas E Dorner and Manfred Maier
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3162524
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A: Public health aspects of diabetes mellitus–epidemiology, prevention strategies, policy implications: the first Austrian diabetes report. Wien Klin Wochenschr
  2. (2004). Allocation of training posts to applicants for postgraduate medical education in austria: survey and analysis. Acad Med
  3. (2011). Armstrong JS: Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, Delphi and prediction markets on an estimation risk.
  4. (2007). Assessing the impact of media guidelines for reporting on suicides in Austria: interrupted time series analysis.
  5. (2009). Beyond the impact factor.
  6. (2008). Canadian Health Services Research Foundation: Insight and Action: Measuring the impact of research: what do we know? (part I). Insight and Action
  7. (2009). Chute R: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures. PLoS ONE
  8. (2006). Describing the impact of health research: a research impact framework.
  9. (2010). EC: Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups. Health Res Policy Sys
  10. (2010). Editors, publishers, impact factors, and reprint income. Plos Med
  11. Evaluating the societal relevance of academic research: a guide (2010). Online resource.[http://www.eric-project.nl/nwohome.nsf/pages/ NWOP_82ZCTD_Eng].
  12. (2010). Homes KL: Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact.
  13. (1996). How can payback from health services research be assessed?
  14. (2009). Impact factor wars: episode V–the empire strikes back.
  15. (2008). Ladle RJ: Citations: poor practices by authors reduce their value. Nature
  16. (2011). Measuring impact of research on society. Nature
  17. (2007). Measuring the impact of family medicine research: scientific citations or societal impact? Fam Pract
  18. (2001). Measuring the social impact of research.
  19. (2006). Men’s health and gender medicine: scientific impact or societal impact?
  20. (2010). Noorden R: Do metrics matter? Nature
  21. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ
  22. (2010). R: A profusion of measures. Nature
  23. (2011). S: Change in conservation efforts. Bioscience
  24. (2002). Sciences: The societal impact of applied health research: towards a quality assessment system
  25. (2006). The Plos Medicine Editors: The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. Plos Med
  26. (2007). Wamelink F: Evaluating research in context: a method for comprehensive assessment The Hague: Consultative Committee of Sector Councils for Research and Development (COS);
  27. (2007). Winkvist A: Qualitative Methodology for International Public Health Umea: Print och Media;