Article thumbnail

Between hope and fear: patient’s expectations prior to pelvic organ prolapse surgery

By Sameh S. S. Lawndy, Mariella I. Withagen, Kirsten B. Kluivers and Mark E. Vierhout
Topics: Original Article
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3162144
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2010). A longitudinal study of patient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery.
  2. (2010). Can sex survive pelvic floor surgery?
  3. (2009). Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
  4. (2010). Effects of guided imagery on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing same-day surgical procedures: a randomized, single-blind study.
  5. (2005). EGGS for patient-centered outcomes.
  6. (1998). Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction.
  7. (1997). Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
  8. (2008). Experiences and expectations of women with urogenital prolapse: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.
  9. (2009). Factors predictive of outcome in tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in a teaching hospital.
  10. (1993). Fear of a cataract operation in aged persons.
  11. (2005). Impact of vaginal surgery on sexuality and quality of life in women with urinary incontinence or genital descensus.
  12. (2010). Inside-out” transobturator tension-free vaginal tape for management of occult stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair.
  13. (2002). Is pelvic organ prolapse a cause of pelvic or low back pain?
  14. (2010). One-year outcome of concurrent anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh surgery for treatment of advanced urogenital prolapse: case series.
  15. (2007). Outcome measures in urogynaecology: the clinicians' perspective.
  16. (2002). Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved?
  17. (2006). Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery.
  18. (2009). Patient-centered treatment goals for pelvic floor disorders: association with quality-of-life and patient satisfaction.
  19. (2003). Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome.
  20. (2008). Patient-selected goals: the fourth dimension in assessment of pelvic floor disorders.
  21. (2004). Pessary test to predict postoperative urinary incontinence in women undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse.
  22. (2005). Reevaluating occult incontinence.
  23. (2008). Safety of Trans Vaginal Mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients.
  24. (1999). Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.
  25. (1998). Standardization of outcome studies in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction: a report on general principles from the Standardisation Committee of the International Continence Society.
  26. (2011). The effect of prolapse surgery on vaginal sensibility.
  27. (2005). The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life.
  28. (2010). Which factors determine subjective improvement following pelvic organ prolapse 1 year after surgery?