Article thumbnail

Neural Underpinnings of Distortions in the Experience of Time Across Senses

By Deborah L. Harrington, Gabriel N. Castillo, Christopher H. Fong and Jason D. Reed

Abstract

Auditory signals (A) are perceived as lasting longer than visual signals (V) of the same physical duration when they are compared together. Despite considerable debate about how this illusion arises psychologically, the neural underpinnings have not been studied. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural bases of audiovisual temporal distortions and more generally, intersensory timing. Adults underwent fMRI while judging the relative duration of successively presented standard interval–comparison interval (CI) pairs, which were unimodal (A–A, V–V) or crossmodal (V–A, A–V). Mechanisms of time dilation and compression were identified by comparing the two crossmodal pairs. Mechanisms of intersensory timing were identified by comparing the unimodal and crossmodal conditions. The behavioral results showed that auditory CIs were perceived as lasting longer than visual CIs. There were three novel fMRI results. First, time dilation and compression were distinguished by differential activation of higher-sensory areas (superior temporal, posterior insula, middle occipital), which typically showed stronger effective connectivity when time was dilated (V–A). Second, when time was compressed (A–V) activation was greater in frontal cognitive-control centers, which guide decision making. These areas did not exhibit effective connectivity. Third, intrasensory timing was distinguished from intersensory timing partly by decreased striatal and increased superior parietal activation. These regions showed stronger connectivity with visual, memory, and cognitive-control centers during intersensory timing. Altogether, the results indicate that time dilation and compression arise from the connectivity strength of higher-sensory systems with other areas. Conversely, more extensive network interactions are needed with core timing (striatum) and attention (superior parietal) centers to integrate time codes for intersensory signals

Topics: Neuroscience
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3147157
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A comparison of visual and auditory motion processing in human cerebral cortex.
  2. (2010). Accumulation of neural activity in theposteriorinsulaencodesthepassage of time.
  3. (1996). AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functionalmagneticresonanceneuroimages.
  4. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time.
  5. (2003). Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception.
  6. (2010). Carvingtheclockatitscomponentjoints: neural bases for interval timing.
  7. (2001). Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insightsfromfunctionalneuroimaging studies.
  8. (2006). Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemakercounter model.
  9. (2011). Current perspectives and methods in studying neural mechanisms of multisensory interactions.
  10. (2001). Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect.
  11. (2000). Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.
  12. (2008). Do we have a common mechanism for measuring time in the hundreds of millisecond range? Evidence from multipleintervaltimingtasks.J.Neurophysiol.
  13. (2011). doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00032 Copyright ©
  14. (2009). Duration discrimination in crossmodal sequences.
  15. (1997). Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality.
  16. (2004). Functional anatomy of the attentional modulation of time estimation.
  17. (2005). Interval-timing deficits in individuals at high risk for schizophrenia.
  18. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends Cogn.
  19. (2009). Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?
  20. Matsuzaka,Y.,andTanji,J.(2009).Interval time coding by neurons in the presupplementary and supplementary motor areas.
  21. (2000). MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum. San Diego:
  22. (2001). Neural correlates of auditory-visualstimulusonsetasynchrony detection.
  23. (2011). Neural mechanisms of audiovisual timing
  24. (2010). Neural modulation of temporal encoding, maintenance, and decision processes.
  25. (2005). Neural network involvedintimeperception:anfMRI study comparing long and short interval estimation.
  26. (2011). Neural underpinnings of distortions in the experience of time across senses.
  27. (2011). paper pending published:28June2011;accepted:13July 2011; published online: 28
  28. Penel,A. (2002).Auditory dominance in temporal processing:newevidencefromsynchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences.
  29. (2003). Processing of temporal information and the basal ganglia: new evidence from fMRI.
  30. (1997). Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging.
  31. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function.
  32. (2007). Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
  33. (2011). Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration.
  34. (2010). Task switching and subjective duration.
  35. (2008). Temporal processing dysfunction in schizophrenia.
  36. (2010). The human basal ganglia modulate frontal-posterior connectivity duringattentionshifting.J.Neurosci.30,
  37. (2010). The lifespan of time intervals in referencememory.Perception39,1431– 1451.
  38. (2010). The neural substrates of subjective time dilation.
  39. (2011). The role of physiological arousal in time perception: psychophysiological evidence from an emotion regulation paradigm.
  40. (2010). The role of the human anterior insular cortex in time processing.
  41. (2009). Theeffectsof stimulusmodalityand frequency of stimulus presentation on cross-modal distraction.
  42. (2006). When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?Q.J.Exp.Psychol.(Colchester)