Article thumbnail

Involuntary Facial Expression Processing: Extracting Information from Two Simultaneously Presented Faces

By Samantha Baggott, Romina Palermo and Mark A. Williams


Facial expressions play an important role in successful social interactions, with previous research suggesting that facial expressions may be processed involuntarily. In the current study, we investigate whether involuntary processing of facial expressions would also occur when facial expression distractors are simultaneously presented in the same spatial location as facial expression targets. Targets and distractors from another stimulus class (lions) were also used. Results indicated that angry facial expression distractors interfered more than neutral face distractors with the ability to respond to both face and lion targets. These findings suggest that information from angry facial expressions can be extracted rapidly from a very brief presentation (50 ms), providing compelling evidence that angry facial expressions are processed involuntarily

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression.
  2. (2006). Bauland A
  3. (2005). Capacity limits for face processing.
  4. (2001). Chaudhuri A
  5. (2004). Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry.
  6. (1989). Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.
  7. (2005). Differential amygdala responses to happy and fearful facial expressions depend on selective attention.
  8. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study.
  9. (1986). Face name interference.
  10. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect.
  11. (2005). Guidance of Visual Search by Preattentive Information.
  12. (2008). Herbert A
  13. (2008). I know how you feel: Task-irrelevant facial expressions are spontaneously processed at a semantic level.
  14. (2003). Ignoring famous faces: Category-specific dilution of distractor interference.
  15. (2010). Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
  16. (1998). Judging words at face value: Interference in a word processing task reveals automatic processing of affective facial expressions.
  17. (2004). Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli.
  18. (2003). Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals.
  19. (2002). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention.
  20. (1991). Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: Implications for visual object representation.
  21. (2011). Processing emotional category congruency between emotional facial expressions and emotional words.
  22. (2006). Recognising faces seen alone or with others: When two heads are worse than one.
  23. (2002). The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception.
  24. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants.
  25. (2003). The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
  26. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs.
  27. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?