In this thesis we consider the Grassmannian complex of projective configurations in weight 2 and 3, and Cathelineau's infinitesimal polylogarithmic complexes as well as a tangential complex to the famous Bloch-Suslin complex (in weight 2) and to Goncharov's ``motivic`` complex (in weight 3), respectively, as proposed by Cathelineau [5].
Our main result is a morphism of complexes between the Grassmannian complexes and the associated infinitesimal polylogarithmic complexes as well as the tangential complexes.
In order to establish this connection we introduce an F-vector space β2D(F), which is an intermediate structure between a \varmathbb{Z}-module B2(F) (scissors congruence group for F) and Cathelineau's F-vector space β2(F) which is an infinitesimal version of it. The structure of β2D(F) is also infinitesimal but it has the advantage of satisfying similar functional equations as the group B2(F). We put this in a complex to form a variant of Cathelineau's infinitesimal complex for weight 2. Furthermore, we define β3D(F) for the corresponding infinitesimal complex in weight 3. One of the important ingredients of the proof of our main results is the rewriting of Goncharov's triple-ratios as the product of two projected cross-ratios. Furthermore, we extend Siegel's cross-ratio identity ([21]) for 2×2 determinants over the truncated polynomial ring F[ε]ν:=F[ε]/εν. We compute cross-ratios and Goncharov's triple-ratios in F[ε]2 and F[ε]3 and use them extensively in our computations for the tangential complexes. We also verify a ''projected five-term'' relation in the group TB2(F) which is crucial to prove one of our central statements Theorem 4.3.3
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.