Article thumbnail

Comparison of Magnetic Navigation System and Conventional Method in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Is Magnetic Navigation System Is More Effective and Safer Than Conventional Method?

By Min Seok Choi, Yong-Seog Oh, Sung Won Jang, Ji Hoon Kim, Woo Seung Shin, Ho-Joong Youn, Wook Sung Jung, Man Young Lee and Ki Bae Seong
Topics: Original Article
Publisher: The Korean Society of Cardiology
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3116102
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation in a high-volume center in 1,000 procedures: still cause for concern?
  2. (2008). Impact of remote magnetic cathteter navigation on ablation fluoroscopy and procedure time. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
  3. Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
  4. Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system: magnetic catheter ablation.
  5. (2006). Remote magnetic navigation for mapping and ablating right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. Heart Rhythm
  6. Remote magnetic navigation: human experience in pulmonary vein ablation.
  7. Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation.