Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The failure to use gender information in parsing: A comment on van Berkum, Brown, and Hagoort (1999)

By M. Brysbaert and D.C. Mitchell

Abstract

We critically review the empirical evidence published by van Berkum, Brown and Hagoort (1999a, 1999b) against syntax-first models of sentence parsing. According to van Berkum et al., discourse factors and word gender information are used instantaneously to guide the parser. First, we note that the density of the experimental trials (relative to fillers) and the slow presentation rate of the van Berkum et al. design seem likely to have elicited the use of tactics involving rapid re-analysis of the material. Second, we present new data from a questionnaire study showing that the grammatical gender information of a relative pronoun in Dutch is often completely ignored, even during the wrap-up at the end of the sentence

Topics: Cognitive Psychology
Year: 2000
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:3445

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). De distributie van het presentatieve er buiten de eerste zinsplaats.
  2. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes.
  3. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain responses to morphosyntactic violations.
  4. (1999). Good enough representations in language and perception.
  5. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In
  6. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch.
  7. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies.
  8. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In
  9. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In
  10. (1999). When does gender constrain parsing? Evidence from ERPs.
  11. (1997). When syntax meets semantics.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.