Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

How can we think the complex?

By Carlos Gershenson and Francis Heylighen

Abstract

In this chapter we want to provide philosophical tools for understanding and reasoning about complex systems. Classical thinking, which is taught at most schools and universities, has several problems for coping with complexity. We review classical thinking and its drawbacks when dealing with complexity, for then presenting ways of thinking which allow the better understanding of complex systems. Examples illustrate the ideas presented. This chapter does not deal with specific tools and techniques for managing complex systems, but we try to bring forth ideas that facilitate the thinking and speaking about complex systems

Topics: Philosophy of Science
Publisher: Information Age Publishers
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:3439
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://cogprints.org/3439/1/Th... (external link)
  • http://cogprints.org/3439/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1985). Anticipatory Systems.
    2. (2001). Causal Architecture, Complexity and Self-Organization in Time Series and Cellular Automata. Doctoral Dissertation.
    3. (2003). Contextual Random Boolean Networks. In
    4. (2001). Cybernetics and Second Order Cybernetics,
    5. (1997). Dynamics of Complex Systems. Addison-Wesley. http://necsi.org/publications/dcs
    6. (1972). More is different.
    7. (2003). The Meaning of Self-organization
    8. (2003). The Science of Self-organization and Adaptivity, in:
    9. (1987). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding.
    10. (2002). When Can we Call a System Self-organizing?

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.