Article thumbnail

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of the Breast: The Nonmalignant Categories

By Paulo Mendoza, Maribel Lacambra, Puay-Hoon Tan and Gary M. Tse


Currently, accurate diagnosis of breast lesions depends on a triple assessment approach comprising clinical, imaging and pathologic examinations. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is widely adopted for the pathologic assessment because of its accurracy and ease of use. While much has been written about the atypical and maliganant categories of FNAC diagnosis, little covers the non-malignanat category which represents a sheer number in all FNAC cases. Moreover, any false-negative diagnosis of the non-malignant cases may lead to missed diagnosis of cancer. This paper aims to discuss the issues of smear adequacy, the cytologic features of benign breast lesions and the dilemma of a false-negative aspirate. Much has been suggested about the smear adequacy criterion, including quantifying epithelial clusters, whereas others advocate basing adequacy on qualitative quantum of using noncellular features of FNAC. Various benign lesions could be easily diagnosed at FNAC; however, they have cytologic features overlapped with malignant lesions. False negativity of FNAC does occur; this could be caused by either “true” false-negative cases attributed to suboptimal sampling technique, poor localization of the mass or nonpalpable lesions or “false” false-negative cases due to interpretational errors. Though false-positive cases are less commonly found, they will also be discussed briefly

Topics: Review Article
Publisher: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2008). A retrospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration for breast lesions and implications for future use,” Diagnostic Cytopathology,
  2. (1999). Accuracy of combined clinical findings and fine needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis inpalpablebreasttumors,”RevistadeInvestigacionClinica,vol.
  3. (1997). Accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the breast,”
  4. (2009). Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology from breast massesinThailand,”AsianPacificJournalofCancerPrevention,
  5. (2005). Analysis of morphologic patterns of fine-needle aspiration of the breast to reduce false-negative results in breast cytology,”
  6. (1997). Breast cytology: statistical analysis and cytohistologic correlations,”
  7. (2008). Calcification in breast lesions: pathologists’ perspective,”
  8. (1993). Clinical correlates of false-negative fine needle aspirations of the breast in a consecutive series of 1005
  9. (2010). Diagnosing breast lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy: which is better?”
  10. (2006). El Hag, “FNA of breast fibroadenoma: observer variability and review of cytomorphology with cytohistological correlation,”
  11. (2007). False-positive and false-negative cases of fine-needle aspiration cytology for palpable breast lesions,”
  12. (1999). Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast fibroadenoma: a cytohistologic correlation study of 405 cases,”
  13. (1997). Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions: histologic subtype in false negative cases,”
  14. (1992). Fine needle aspiration cytology of solid masses,”
  15. (1987). Fine needle aspiration ofthebreast.Importanceoftheaspirator,”Acta
  16. (1997). Fine-needle aspiration of 697 palpable breast
  17. (2004). H o w e l l ,R .G a n d o u r - E d w a r d s ,K .F o l k i n s ,R .D a v i s
  18. (1994). Histologic changes in the breast after fine-needle aspiration,”
  19. (1997). Insearch of specimen adequacy in fine needle aspirates of non palpable breast lesions,”
  20. (1991). L.A.BrownandS.B.Coghill,“Fineneedleaspirationcytology of the breast: factors affecting sensitivity,”
  21. (2001). M o r r i s ,J .S .S t e v e n s ,R .F .P o m m i e r ,W .S .F l e t c h e r ,a n dJ .
  22. (2001). Multinucleated stromal giant cells in mammary phyllodes tumours,”
  23. (1994). P o w e l l ,M .L .C r a n o r ,a n dP .P .R o s e n ,“ M u l t i n u c l e a t e d stromal giant cells in mammary fibroepithelial neoplasms: a study of 11 patients,”
  24. (1998). Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4110 cases,”
  25. (1991). S c o p a ,D .K o u k o u r a s ,J .A n d r o u l a k i s ,a n dD .B o n i k o s , “Sources of diagnostic discrepancies in fine-needle aspiration of the breast,”
  26. (1998). Specimen adequacy and falsenegative diagnosis rate in fine-needle aspirates of palpable breast masses,”
  27. (1992). Spontaneous infarction of an intraductal papillomaofthebreast:cytologicalpresentationonfineneedle aspiration,”
  28. (1994). Subclassification of benign breast disease by fine needle aspiration cytology: comparison of cytologic and histologic findings in 265 palpable breast masses,”
  29. (2001). The role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions,”
  30. (1996). The uniform approach to breast fine needle aspiration biopsy.
  31. (2011). The value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic assessmentofpalpablebreastlesions,”DiagCytopathol,vol.39,
  32. (1987). Three year follow-up of benign fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the breast,”
  33. (1998). Tsimikas et al., “Rate of insufficientsamplesforfine-needleaspirationfornonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial,”
  34. (2008). u ie ta l . ,“ F i n en e e d l e aspiration cytology of papillary lesions of the breast: how accurate is the diagnosis?”
  35. (1999). Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute- supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA,”
  36. (1994). Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions: cytologic and histologic findings,”
  37. (1997). Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and costeffective,”AmericanJournalofSurgery,vol.174,no.6,pp.694– 698,
  38. (1997). What constitutes an adequate smear
  39. (1991). Z a r b o ,P .J .H o w a n i t z ,a n dP .B a c h n e r ,“ I n t e r i n s t i t u t i o n a l comparison of performance in breast fine-needle aspiration cytology: a Q-probe quality indicator study,”