Article thumbnail

Interviewer versus self-administered health-related quality of life questionnaires - Does it matter?

By Milo A Puhan, Alka Ahuja, Mark L Van Natta, Lori E Ackatz and Curtis Meinert
Topics: Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3100232
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). A comparison of regression calibration, moment reconstruction and imputation for adjusting for covariate measurement error in regression. Stat Med
  2. Aaronson NK: Effects of mode of administration (MOA) on the measurement properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30: a randomized study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 8:35.
  3. (2005). al: A randomised trial to evaluate the self-administered standardised chronic respiratory questionnaire. Eur Respir J
  4. (1997). Bozzette SA: Applications of the Medical Outcomes Study health-related quality of life measures in HIV/ AIDS. Qual Life Res
  5. (2007). Endres HG: Randomised controlled comparison of the Health Survey Short Form (SF-12) and the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) in telephone interviews versus self-administered questionnaires. Are the results equivalent? BMC Med Res Methodol
  6. (2009). et al: Expansion of the prognostic assessment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the updated BODE index and the ADO index. Lancet
  7. (2002). Furuta K: Comparability of epidemiological information between self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires.
  8. (2008). Gerbase MW: Comparing a disease-specific and a generic health-related quality of life instrument in subjects with asthma from the general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes
  9. (2004). HJ: Self-administration and intervieweradministration of the German Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: instrument development and assessment of validity and reliability in two randomised studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes
  10. (2007). Hogh A: A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey. BMC Med Res Methodol
  11. (2000). Kop WJ: Association between depression and mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med
  12. (2009). LD: Relationship between the EQ-5D index and measures of clinical outcomes in selected studies of cardiovascular interventions. Health Qual Life Outcomes
  13. (1997). Malitz FE: Evidence for reliability, validity and usefulness of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOSHIV). Qual Life Res
  14. (2005). MC: Health-related quality of life as a predictor of hospital readmission and death among patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med
  15. (2007). MD: Longitudinal study of the ocular complications of AIDS: 1. Ocular diagnoses at enrollment. Ophthalmology
  16. (2007). MD: Longitudinal study of the ocular complications of AIDS: 2. Ocular examination results at enrollment. Ophthalmology
  17. (2000). Measurement error correction using validation data: a review of methods and their applicability in case-control studies. Stat Methods Med Res
  18. (2006). Measuring health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults: Swedish normative data for the SF-36 and the HADS, and the influence of age, gender, and method of administration. Health Qual Life Outcomes
  19. (1995). MM: Does the mode of questionnaire administration affect the reporting of urinary symptoms? Urology
  20. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf)
  21. (2006). Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
  22. (1996). PB: Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration?
  23. (1996). Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials.
  24. (2009). Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008. Health Qual Life Outcomes
  25. (2006). Quality of life scores differed according to mode of administration in a review of three major oncology questionnaires.
  26. (1998). RD: Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol
  27. (1998). Sanson-Fisher RW: An examination of self- and telephoneadministered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol
  28. (2000). SL: Health-related quality of life among people with HIV disease: results from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Qual Life Res
  29. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
  30. (1997). The effect of mode Puhan et al.
  31. (1996). The EuroQol instrument: An index of health-related quality of life.
  32. (2005). Valuation of the EuroQol EQ-5D Health States.
  33. (1996). Wong CJ: Does self-administration of a quality of life index for inflammatory bowel disease change the results? J Clin Epidemiol