Article thumbnail

A Comparison of Different Approaches to Estimate Small-Scale Spatial Variation in Outdoor NO2 Concentrations

By Marieke B. Dijkema, Ulrike Gehring, Rob T. van Strien, Saskia C. van der Zee, Paul Fischer, Gerard Hoek and Bert Brunekreef
Topics: Research
Publisher: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2011). 672 v o l u m e 119 | n u m b e r 5 |
  2. (2011). 674 v o l u m e 119 | n u m b e r 5 |
  3. (2006). A land use regression model for predicting ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide in Hamilton,
  4. (2000). A regression-based method for mapping trafficrelated air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments.
  5. (2008). A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution. Atmos Environ 42:7561–7578.
  6. (2002). Air pollution and health.
  7. (2007). Application of land use regression to estimate long-term concentrations of traffic-related nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol 41:2422–2428.
  8. (2011). b≥ 5,000 vehicles/24 hr. c≥ 10,000 vehicles/24 hr.Approaches to modeling spatial variation of NO2 Environmental Health Perspectives • v o l u m e 119 | n u m b e r 5 |
  9. (2008). Comparison of regression models with land-use and emissions data to predict the spatial distribution of traffic-related air pollution in Rome.
  10. (1289). for the geographic databases (including traffic and land-use data) used in this study can be found in Supplemental Material, Annex A
  11. (2005). GIS-based estimation of exposure to particulate matter and NO2 in an urban area: stochastic versus dispersion modeling. Environ Health Perspect 113:987–992.
  12. (2006). Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect.
  13. (1993). In this study, the Dutch modeling tool
  14. (2009). Likelihood of meeting the EU limit values for NO2 and PM10 concentrations in the Netherlands. Atmos Environ 43:3060–3069.
  15. (2006). Long-term personal exposure to traffic-related air pollution among school children, a validation study. Sci Total Environ 368:567–573.
  16. (2009). Mapping of background air pollution at a fine spatial scale across the European Union. Sci Total Environ 407:1852–1867.
  17. (1997). Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach.
  18. (2007). Modeling the intraurban variability of ambient traffic pollution in Toronto,
  19. (2003). Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ 37:155–182.
  20. (1997). New high resolution maps of estimated background ambient NOx and NO2 concentrations in the U.K. Atmos Environ 31:3591–3602.
  21. (2006). Nitrogen dioxide prediction in Southern California using land use regression modeling: potential for environmental health analyses.
  22. (1976). Personal sampler for nitrogen dioxide.
  23. (2003). The CAR model is a semiempirical model derived from a more detailed Gaussian model and adapted to calculate air quality near roads (Vardoulakis
  24. (1993). The CAR model: the Dutch method to determine city street air quality. Atmos Environ 27B:389–399.
  25. (2006). the Netherlands) to predict
  26. (2006). Use of GIS and ancillary variables to predict volatile organic compound and nitrogen dioxide levels at unmonitored locations. Atmos Environ 40:3773–3787.
  27. (2004). Vergelijking van de gemodelleerde en gemeten stikstofdioxide concentraties op drukke wegvakken in Amsterdam [in Dutch]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands:GGD
  28. (2008). Within-urban variability in ambient air pollution: comparison of estimation methods. Atmos Environ 42:1359–1369.