Article thumbnail

LV reverse remodeling imparted by aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis; is it durable? A cardiovascular MRI study sponsored by the American Heart Association

By Robert WW Biederman, James A Magovern, Saundra B Grant, Ronald B Williams, June A Yamrozik, Diane A Vido, Vikas K Rathi, Geetha Rayarao, Ketheswaram Caruppannan and Mark Doyle
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3094375
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). Abnormal subendocardial blood flow in pressure overload hypertrophy is associated with pacing-induced subendocardial dysfunction.
  2. (2005). ASSERT (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echocardiography Randomized Trial) Investigators. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Circ 112(17): 2696–702, Epub
  3. (1998). Chambers J. How often do we operate too late in aortic stenosis?
  4. (1994). Collagen network of the myocardium: function, structural remodeling and regulatory mechanisms.
  5. (1996). Coronary vascular morphology in pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy.
  6. (1998). Cytoskeletal role in the transition from compensated to decompensated hypertrophy during adult canine left ventricular pressure overloading.
  7. (2000). Differential effects of pressure or volume overload on myocardial MMP levels and inhibitory control.
  8. (2002). Does the Adage, “There is Safety in Numbers” Lead Us Astray? An MRI Remodeling Study.
  9. (2004). Early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement by the Ross procedure detected by cine MRI.
  10. (2005). Impact of postoperative blood pressure control on regression of left ventricular mass following valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27(6): 994–9, Epub
  11. (2007). Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
  12. (1993). Influence of collagen network on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic valve disease.
  13. (1988). Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2011, 6:53 http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/6/1/53 Page 7 of 8Smucker,
  14. (2000). Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis.
  15. (1999). Left ventricular remodeling after aortic valve replacement.
  16. (2007). LV Reverse Remodeling Imparted by Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis; Is it Durable? A Cardiovascular MRI Study sponsored by the American Heart Association. Circ 116(suppII): 543, 16 abst.
  17. (1995). Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient.
  18. (2004). Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in pressure-overloaded human myocardium during heart failure progression.
  19. (1999). Molecular Mechanisms of myocardial remodeling.
  20. (2005). Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging.
  21. (1999). Normalization of left ventricular dimensions after Ross operation with aortic annular reduction.
  22. (2007). One year hemodynamic performance of the Perimount Magna pericardial xenograft and the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a prospective randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6(3): 345–9, Epub
  23. (2005). Physiologic Compensation is Supranormal in Compensated Aortic Stenosis: Does it Return to Normal after Aortic Valve Replacement or is it Blunted by Coexistent Coronary Artery Disease? Circ 112(suppl I):
  24. (2004). Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in the left ventricular myocardium of patients with aortic stenosis.
  25. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: • Convenient online submission • Thorough peer review • No space constraints or color figure charges • Immediate publication on acceptance