Article thumbnail

Factors predicting completion and time to publication of Cochrane reviews

By Andrea C Tricco, David Moher, Maggie H Chen and Raymond Daniel
Topics: Research
Publisher: Open Medicine Publications, Inc.
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3090115
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
  2. (1998). Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials.
  3. (2008). Following 411 Cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One.
  4. Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.
  5. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.
  6. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects.
  7. (2005). Publication bias: recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm.
  8. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.
  9. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence.
  10. The log transformation is special.
  11. (2007). Time to publication for results of clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.