Article thumbnail

Tobacco litter costs and public policy: a framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs

By John E Schneider, N Andrew Peterson, Noemi Kiss, Omar Ebeid and Alexis S Doyle
Topics: Research Paper
Publisher: BMJ Group
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3088473
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). A Rising Tide of Ocean Debris: Report of the
  2. (2001). A study of the litter loadings in urban drainage systemsemethodology and objectives. Water Sci Technol
  3. (2005). Anti-littering campaign targets cigarette butts. Government Product News
  4. (2009). Associations between health and different types of environmental incivility: a Scotland-wide study. Public Health
  5. (2010). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
  6. Cigarette Butt Pollution Project takes aim at tons of toxic waste.
  7. (2009). Cigarette butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste.
  8. (2000). Cigarette Butts as Litter: Toxic as Well as Ugly? Underwater Naturalist Bulletin of the American Littoral Society.
  9. (2009). Cigarette butts: tiny trash that piles up.
  10. (2008). Cigarette taxes and youth smoking: new evidence from national, state, and local Youth Risk Behavior Surveys.
  11. (2003). City of Toronto Launches Litter Prevention Program. City of Toronto
  12. (1999). Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use. Tob Control
  13. (1973). Consumption Externalities and Imperfect Corrective Pricing.
  14. (2010). Convention and Visitors Bureau. San Francisco Fact Sheet.
  15. (2004). Cross-cultural behaviour research in tourism: a case study on destination image.
  16. (2010). Department of Public Works. San Francisco Department of Public Works: Fiscal Year 2009e2010 Annual Report.
  17. (2008). Disease Control and Prevention.
  18. (1997). Disease Control and Prevention. Ingestion of cigarettes and cigarette butts by children. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep
  19. (2010). Effective Regulation through Credible CostBenefit Analysis: The Opportunity Costs of Superfund. Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation. Cambridge:
  20. (2007). Environmental-Economic Measures of Tourism Yield.
  21. Graffiti and litter lead to more street crime.
  22. (1994). Ingestion of cigarettes and cigarette butts by childreneRhode Island,
  23. (2007). Literature RevieweLitter: A Review of Litter Studies, Attitude Surveys, and Other Litter-Related Literature.
  24. (2004). Litter Rubbishes Tourism Trade.
  25. (2009). Littering Behavior in America: Results of a National Study. San Marcos, CA: Action Research/Keep America Beautiful,
  26. (2007). Minnesota Tobacco-Free Park Policies: Attitudes of the General Public and Park Officials. Nicotine & Tobacco Research:
  27. (2009). National Visible Litter Survey and Litter Cost Study.
  28. (2003). of Commerce. Overseas Visitors to Select U.S. Cities/Hawaiian Islands,
  29. of the Census. Table 1: Leading Places on Percent Change in Daytime Population, by Size (Total Resident Population). Estimated Daytime Population and Employment-ResidenceRatios:2000.Washington,DC:U.S.BureauoftheCensus,2000.
  30. On the Jersey Shore, Business Crumbles Like a Sand Castle. BusinessWeek
  31. (2007). Outlook. Electronic Outlook Report from the Electronic Research Service TBS-263.
  32. (2007). Performance reconnaissance of stormwater proprietary best management practices. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng
  33. (2009). Preliminary Report: San Francisco Super Site Data
  34. (2006). Price and cigarette consumption in Europe. Tob Control
  35. (2008). Price effects on the smoking behaviour of adult age groups. Public Health
  36. (2008). Raising taxes to reduce smoking prevalence in the US: a simulation of the anticipated health and economic impacts. Public Health
  37. (1999). Sex and race differences in young people’s responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies. Tob Control
  38. (2008). Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, longterm threat. Environ Res
  39. (2007). Taxing consumption and other sins.
  40. (2008). Tetlock PC. Has economic analysis improved regulatory decisions?
  41. (2009). The City of San Francisco Streets Litter Re-Audit
  42. (2008). The City of San Francisco Streets Litter Re-Audit.
  43. (2004). The economic burden of smoking in California. Tob Control
  44. (1988). The Firm, the Market and the Law.
  45. (1999). The Florida Litter Study: Economic Impacts of Litter on Florida’s Businesses.
  46. (2006). The impact of tobacco tax cuts on smoking initiation among Canadian young adults.
  47. (2002). The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Pollut Bull
  48. (1982). The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking.
  49. (2006). The week; tobacco trash dominates Haul at State Shoreline.
  50. Tobacco and cigarette butt consumption in humans and animals. Tob Control 2011;20(Supp 1):i16ei19.
  51. (2004). Understanding Urban Tourism: Image, Culture, and Experience.
  52. (2000). USBureauoftheCensus.PHC-T-40:EstimatedDaytimePopulationandEmploymentResidence Ratios:
  53. (2008). Using Benefit-Cost Analysis to Improve Environmental Regulation. Applied Benefit-Cost Analysis: Elgar Reference Collection.
  54. (2006). Variation in, and causes of, toxicity of cigarette butts to a cladoceran and microtox. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol
  55. (2009). Waste on the roadside, “poi-sute” waste: Its distribution and elution potential of pollutants into environment. Waste Manag
  56. (2006). Where there’s smoke, there’s litter. Waste News
  57. (2010). Who Gives a Hoot? Intercept Surveys of Litterers and Dosposers. Environ Behav.
  58. (2005). Who is responsible for marine debris? the international politics of cleaning our oceans.