Article thumbnail

Agri-Environmental Policy Measures in Israel: The Potential of Using Market-Oriented Instruments

By Liron Amdur, Elke Bertke, Jan Freese and Rainer Marggraf

Abstract

This paper examines the possibilities of developing agri-environmental policy measures in Israel, focusing on market-oriented instruments. A conceptual framework for developing agri-environmental policy measures is presented, first in very broad lines (mandatory regulations, economic instruments and advisory measures) and subsequently focusing on economic instruments, and specifically, on market-oriented ones. Two criteria of choice between the measures are suggested: their contribution to improving the effectiveness of the policy; and the feasibility of their implementation. This is the framework used for analyzing agri-environmental measures in Israel. Israel currently implements a mix of mandatory regulations, economic instruments and advisory measures to promote the agri-environment. The use of additional economic instruments may improve the effectiveness of the policy. When comparing the effectiveness of various economic measures, we found that the feasibility of implementation of market-oriented instruments is greater, due to the Israeli public’s preference for strengthening market orientation in the agricultural sector. Four market-oriented instruments were practiced in a pilot project conducted in an Israeli rural area. We found that in this case study, the institutional feasibility and acceptance by stakeholders were the major parameters influencing the implementation of the market-oriented instruments, whereas the instruments’ contribution to enhancing the ecological or economic effectiveness were hardly considered by the stakeholders as arguments in favor of their use

Topics: Article
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3087874
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payment for soil erosion control in Indonesia.
  2. (2007). A sciencedriven market-based instrument for determining the cost of environmental services: a comparison of two catchments in Australia. Ecological Economics 64:61–69 874 Environmental Management (2011) 47:859–875 123Marggraf R
  3. (2006). Accessed 6F e b r u a r y2 0 1 0 Scozzafava S, de Sanctis A
  4. (2009). An indicator species approach for result-orientated subsidies of ecological services in grasslands—a study in Northwestern Germany.
  5. (1998). Auctions as a means of creating a market for public goods from agriculture.
  6. (2010). Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/ publi/reports/agrienv/rep_en.pdf.
  7. (2007). Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development. Goettingen University, Goettingen, p 185 Schilizzi S, Latacz-Lohmann U
  8. (2004). Experimental assessment of runoff and soil erosion in an olive grove on Vertic soil in southern Spain as affected by soil management.
  9. (2010). Feitelson E
  10. (1989). Government contracts in Israel. Public Contract Law Journal 18:34–53 Shemesh-Adani O
  11. (2003). How effective are European agrienvironment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
  12. (2007). ICBS (2006) Statistical Abstract of Israel
  13. (2009). Measurement of the economic value of agricultural areas a tourist resource. Israel Ministry of Agriculture, Rehovot (Hebrew) Frenkel A
  14. (2008). Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payment for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries.
  15. (2002). The regional council and the local committee: adjustment in the changing environment. The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies, Jerusalem (Hebrew) Bauer S