Article thumbnail

Frequency of Aneuploidy Related to Age in Porcine Oocytes

By Miroslav Hornak, Michal Jeseta, Petra Musilova, Antonin Pavlok, Michal Kubelka, Jan Motlik, Jiri Rubes and Martin Anger


It is generally accepted that mammalian oocytes are frequently suffering from chromosome segregation errors during meiosis I, which have severe consequences, including pregnancy loss, developmental disorders and mental retardation. In a search for physiologically more relevant model than rodent oocytes to study this phenomenon, we have employed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), combined with whole genome amplification (WGA), to study the frequency of aneuploidy in porcine oocytes, including rare cells obtained from aged animals. Using this method, we were able to analyze segregation pattern of each individual chromosome during meiosis I. In contrast to the previous reports where conventional methods, such as chromosome spreads or FISH, were used to estimate frequency of aneuploidy, our results presented here show, that the frequency of this phenomenon was overestimated in porcine oocytes. Surprisingly, despite the results from human and mouse showing an increase in the frequency of aneuploidy with advanced maternal age, our results obtained by the most accurate method currently available for scoring the aneuploidy in oocytes indicated no increase in the frequency of aneuploidy even in oocytes from animals, whose age was close to the life expectancy of the breed

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2008). Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs.
  2. (1998). Analysis of aneuploidy rate in antral and ovulated mouse oocytes during female aging.
  3. (1998). Aneuploidy in bovine oocytes matured in vitro.
  4. (1998). Chromosome 21 detection in human oocyte fluorescence in situ hybridization: possible effect of maternal age.
  5. (2003). Chromosome abnormalities in secondary pig oocytes matured in vitro.
  6. (2009). Comparative genomic hybridization of oocytes and first polar bodies from young donors.
  7. (1993). Cytogenetic evaluation of ova from pubertal and third-estrous gilts.
  8. (1991). Differential distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes according to their sex.
  9. (2005). Effect of maternal age on the frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities in human oocytes.
  10. (2009). Evidence that a defective spindle assembly checkpoint is not the primary cause of maternal ageassociated aneuploidy in mouse eggs.
  11. (2010). Female meiosis: coming unglued with age.
  12. (2005). Frequency and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in human oocytes.
  13. (2010). Frequency of aneuploidy in in vitro-matured MII oocytes and corresponding first polar bodies in two dairy cattle (Bos taurus) breeds as determined by dualcolor fluorescent in situ hybridization.
  14. (2001). Frequency of aneuploidy in pig oocytes matured in vitro and of the corresponding first polar bodies detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization.
  15. (2007). Gender effects on the incidence of aneuploidy in mammalian germ cells.
  16. (2007). Gilts and sows produce similar rate of diploid oocytes in vitro whereas the incidence of aneuploidy differs significantly.
  17. (2009). Investigation of chromosome aneuploidies in early porcine embryos using comparative genomic hybridization.
  18. (2003). Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes.
  19. (2007). Reproductive oocyte/embryo genetic analysis: comparison between fluorescence in-situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization.
  20. (2002). Sex matters in meiosis.
  21. (2005). The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research.
  22. (2001). To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy.
  23. (2010). Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos.
  24. (2010). What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!