Article thumbnail

A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery

By Eva M Bitzer, Marco Petrucci, Christoph Lorenz, Rugzan Hussein, Hans Dörning, Alf Trojan and Stefan Nickel
Topics: Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3083321
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1938). A New Measure of Rank Correlation. Biometrika
  2. (2008). A: Assessing patientreported outcomes of cholecystectomy in short-stay surgery. Surg Endosc
  3. (2008). A: Patient-reported outcomes in hernia repair. Hernia
  4. (2008). AA: The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain
  5. (1998). Augustin: Asgard;
  6. (2002). HS: Low back pain recollection versus concurrent accounts: outcomes analysis. Spine
  7. Kohlmann T: Ergebnisevaluation in der Klinik: Probleme der ‘Outcomes’-Messung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation.
  8. (1981). L: Influence of subject response style effects on retrospective meausres. Applied Psychological Measurement
  9. (2004). MG: Different methods to assess quality of life from multiple follow-ups in a longitudinal asthma study.
  10. (2003). P: A Comparison of Three Retrospective Self-reporting Methods of Measuring Change in Instructional Practice.
  11. (2006). Patients undergoing knee surgery provided accurate ratings of preoperative quality of life and function 2 weeks after surgery.
  12. (2003). Prospective vs. retrospective assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with advanced prostate cancer: the effect of ‘response shift’.
  13. (2002). Raspe H: Indirekte versus direkte Veränderungsmessung und ihre prognostische Bedeutung. 11. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium Frankfurt: VdR;
  14. (2005). Reliability of retrospective clinical data to evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar fusion in chronic low back pain. Spine
  15. (1995). Reporting current, past, and changed health status. What we know about distortion. Med Care
  16. (2000). Response shift in quality of life measurement in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Qual Life Res
  17. (2009). SJ: Older patients can accurately recall their preoperative health status six weeks following total hip arthroplasty.
  18. (2001). Sledge CB: Pitfalls of using patient recall to derive preoperative status in outcome studies of total knee arthroplasty.
  19. (2007). Sprangers MA: Are retrospective measures of change in quality of life more valid than prospective measures? Med Care
  20. (1999). Sprangers MAG: Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal quality of life research.
  21. (2011). The king’s foot of patient-reported outcomes: current practices and new developments for the measurement of change. Qual Life Res
  22. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics
  23. (2001). Thode HC: Ability of patients to accurately recall the severity of acute painful events. Acad Emerg Med
  24. (1995). Troidl H: Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument.
  25. (2002). Varianten der Veränderungsmessung auf dem Prüfstand: Probleme der Konsistenz und Validität von direkten, indirekten und quasi-indirekten Assessmentstrategien. 11. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium Frankfurt: VdR;
  26. (2002). WW: Evaluation der Effektivität psychosomatischer Rehabilitation: Wie gut stimmen echte und retrospektive Vorher-Nachher-Vergleiche überein? Ergebnisse aus der EQUA-Studie. 11. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium Frankfurt: VdR;