Article thumbnail

Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference

By Dr. Siu L Chow


This paper is a reply to some comments made by Green (2002) on Chow’s (2002) critique of Wilkinson and Task Force's (1999) report on statistical inference. Issues raised are (a) the inappropriateness of accepting methodological prescription on authority, (ii) the vacuity of non-falsifiable theories, (iii) the need to distinguish between experiment and meta﷓experiment, and (iv) the probability foundation of the null﷓hypothesis significance﷓test procedure (NHSTP). This reply is intended to foster a better understanding of research methods in general, and of the role of NHSTP in empirical research in particular

Topics: Clinical Psychology, Philosophy of Science
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (1940). An inquiry into meaning and truth. London: George Allen and Unwin. doi
  2. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method.
  3. (1999). and Task Force on Statistical Inference, APA Board of Scientific Affairs.
  4. (1960). Conclusions vs. doi
  5. (1969). Demand characteristics and the concept of quasi-controls. In
  6. (2002). Experimentation in psychology--Rationale, concepts, and issues.
  7. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research (Enlarged edition). doi
  8. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research.
  9. (1985). Iconic store and partial report.
  10. (1987). Methods in psychological research.
  11. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.
  12. (1969). Perspective: Artifact and control. In
  13. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. doi
  14. (2002). Taken by storm: The troubled science, policy and politics of global warming.
  15. (1963). The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. doi
  16. (1994). The experimenter's expectancy effect: a meta-experiment. Zeitschrift fűr Pädagogische Psychologie (German
  17. (1954). The nature and history of experimental control.
  18. (1963). Three experiments in experimenter bias. doi