Article thumbnail

An Organizing Framework for Translation in Public Health: The Knowledge to Action Framework

By Katherine M. Wilson, Teresa J. Brady and Catherine Lesesne


A priority for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is translating scientific knowledge into action to improve the public's health. No area has a more pressing need for translation than the prevention and control of chronic diseases. Staff from CDC's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion worked across disciplines and content areas to develop an organizing framework to describe and depict the high-level processes necessary to move from discovery into action through translation of evidence-based programs, practices, or policies. The Knowledge to Action (K2A) Framework identifies 3 phases (research, translation, and institutionalization) and the decision points, interactions, and supporting structures within the phases that are necessary to move knowledge to sustainable action. Evaluation undergirds the entire K2A process. Development of the K2A Framework highlighted the importance of planning for translation, attending to supporting structures, and evaluating the public health impact of our efforts

Topics: Special Topic
Publisher: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid.
  2. (2011). Active for Life: final results from the translation of two physical
  3. Advancing prevention science and practice: challenges, critical issues, and future directions.
  4. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation.
  5. Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature.
  6. Developing effective prevention services for the real world: a prevention service development model.
  7. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.
  8. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. 5th edition.
  9. (1999). Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep
  10. Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions.
  11. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
  12. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
  13. (2008). Health education and health behavior: theory, research, and practice. 4th edition.
  14. (2005). Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa (FL):
  15. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Work Group on Translation. Focusing on public health: a different look at translating research to practice.
  16. (2005). Program sustainability begins with the first events. Eval Program Plann
  17. Promoting science-based approaches to teen pregnancy prevention: proactively engaging the three systems of the Interactive Systems Framework.
  18. Public health interventions for arthritis: expanding the toolbox of evidence-based interventions.
  19. Reframing the dissemination challenge: a marketing and distribution perspective.
  20. Science Application Team. An agency capacity model to facilitate implementation of evidence-based behavioral interventions by community-based organizations.
  21. (2001). Searching for evidence about health education and health behavior interventions. Health Educ Behav
  22. (2004). The global burden of disease:
  23. (2004). The growing burden of chronic disease in America. Public Health Rep
  24. (2003). The manager’s guide to program evaluation: planning, contracting, and managing for useful results. Saint Paul (MN): Amherst H. Wilder Foundation;
  25. The prevention delivery system: organizational context and use of comprehensive programming frameworks.
  26. Translating and disseminating research- and practicebased criteria to support evidence-based intervention planning.
  27. Unpacking prevention capacity: an intersection of research-to-practice models and communitycentered models.