Article thumbnail

Epidemiological approaches in the investigation of environmental causes of cancer: the case of dioxins and water disinfection by-products

By Manolis Kogevinas


I will refer in this paper to difficulties in research in environmental causes of cancer using as examples research on dioxins and on drinking water disinfection by-products (DBPs) that have created considerable controversy in the scientific and wider community. Dioxins are highly toxic chemicals that are animal carcinogens. For many years, evaluation of the carcinogenicity of dioxins in humans was based on case-control or registry based studies. The development of methods to measure dioxins in blood indicated that these studies suffered from extreme exposure misclassification. The conduct of large cohort studies of workers with widely contrasted exposures together with the use of biomarkers and models for exposure assessment, led to convincing evidence on the carcinogenicity of dioxins in humans. The high toxicity of a few dioxin congeners, the availability of a scheme to characterize the toxicity of a mixture of dioxins and related compounds and the long half-life of these compounds facilitated epidemiological research. Contrary to dioxins, trihalomethanes (THMs) and most of the hundreds of DBPs in drinking water are chemicals of low toxicity. For more than 15 years, the main evidence on the carcinogenicity of DBPs was through ecological or death certificate studies. More recent studies based on individual assessment confirmed increases in bladder cancer risk. However even those studies ignored the toxicological evidence on the importance of routes of exposure to DBPs other than ingestion and, probably, underestimated the risk. Persistence of weak study designs together with delays in advanced exposure assessment models led to delays in confirming early evidence on the carcinogenicity of DBPs. The evaluation of only a few chemicals when exposure is to a complex mixture remains a major problem in exposure assessment for DBPs. The success of epidemiological studies in identifying increased risks lies primarily on the wide contrast of exposure to DBPs in the general population that overcomes the significant exposure misclassification. Exposure assessment has been the Achilles heel for studies on dioxins and DBPs and cancer. The combination of powerful study designs, advanced exposure assessment together with a better understanding of mechanisms of disease and the use of biomarkers of exposure, led to the strengthening of the epidemiological evidence

Topics: Proceedings
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). A metaanalysis of studies on individual consumption of chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancer.
  2. (1990). Adami HO: Exposure to dioxins as a risk factor for soft tissue sarcoma: a population-based case-control study.
  3. (2006). Assessment of lifetime exposure to trihalomethanes through different routes. Occup Environ Med
  4. (2006). Cancer and pesticides: an overview and some results of the Italian multicenter casecontrol study on hematolymphopoietic malignancies.
  5. (1997). Dioxin Revisited: Developments Since the
  6. (2007). DM: Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: a review and roadmap for research. Mutat Res
  7. (2006). Environmental and occupational causes of cancer re-visited.
  8. (1995). Epidemiology faces its limits. Science
  9. (1976). Epstein SS: Drinking water and cancer mortality in Louisiana. Science
  10. (1987). et al: Bladder cancer, drinking water source, and tap water consumption: a case-control study.
  11. (1996). et al: Cancer mortality in German male workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides and dioxins. Cancer Causes Control
  12. (1994). et al: Evaluation of dermal and respiratory chloroform exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect
  13. (1998). et al: Second followup of a Dutch cohort occupationally exposed to phenoxy herbicide, chlorophenols, and contaminants.
  14. FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, fiftyseventh meeting,
  15. for Research on Cancer (IARC): Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans.
  16. (2002). for Research on Cancer: Some drinking water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic. In IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 84.
  17. (1999). heart disease, and diabetes in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxin.
  18. (2006). Human cancer from environmental pollutants: The epidemiological evidence. Mutation Research
  19. (1991). IARC: Chlorinated drinking water; chlorination by products; some other halogenated compounds; cobalt and cobalt compounds.
  20. (2000). JV: Household exposures to drinking water disinfection by-products: whole blood trihalomethane levels. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol
  21. (1992). LL: Serum 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin levels of New Zealand pesticide applicators and their implication for cancer hypotheses.
  22. (2003). Meta-Analysis of Dioxin Cancer DoseResponse for Three Occupational Cohorts. Environ Health Persp
  23. (2004). Pooled analysis of case-control studies of bladder cancer and disinfection by-products. Epidemiology
  24. (1979). Sandström A: Case-control study: soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids or chlorophenols.
  25. (1997). Saracci R: Cancer mortality in workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols and dioxins. An expanded and updated international cohort study.
  26. (1995). Saracci R: Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols, and dioxins: Two nested case-control studies. Epidemiology
  27. (2008). SD: Comparative mammalian cell toxicity of N-DBPs and C-DBPs. In Occurrence, formation, health effects and control of disinfection by-products in drinking water. Volume 995.
  28. (1981). The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today.
  29. (1990). Thirty-four-year mortality follow-up of BASF employees exposed to 2,3,7,8-TCDD after the 1953 accident. Int Arch Occup Environ Health
  30. (2009). Working Group: A review of human carcinogens–Part F: chemical agents and related occupations. Lancet Oncol
  31. (2005). World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci