Article thumbnail

The quality of reporting of primary test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: application of the STARD criteria

By Tara J Selman, R Katie Morris, Javier Zamora and Khalid S Khan
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3072919
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). C: An evidence based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic onlcology: the STARD checklist. Gynecologic Oncology
  2. (1998). CONSORT: an evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
  3. (2006). de Vet HC: The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology
  4. (2003). de Vet HC: Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ
  5. (1996). Evaluating diagnostic tests. Baillieres Clinical Obsetrics and Gynaecology.
  6. (2001). Evaluation of clinical test II: assessment of validity.
  7. (2004). Evidence-based obstetric and gynaecologic diagnosis: the STARD checklist for authors, peer-reviewers and readers of test accuracy studies.
  8. (2002). Khan KS: Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature.
  9. (2006). Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative. Fertil Steril
  10. (2008). The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review. Clin Experiment Opthalmol