Location of Repository

Upgrading the technological capabilities of foreign transnational subsidiaries in developing countries: the case of electronics in Thailand

By Michael Hobday and Howard Rush

Abstract

Although substantial research shows the importance of transnational corporations (TNCs) to export-led growth in some developing countries, it cannot be assumed that TNC subsidiaries will automatically upgrade their capabilities through time or in a uniform fashion. This paper explores the pattern and pace of a sample of exporting TNC subsidiaries operating in the electronics industry in Thailand, showing how the different architectures of global value chains (centralised versus decentralised) shaped the technological progress of subsidiaries in this country. The case evidence suggests a wide variety in upgrading through time, with some subsidiaries failing to develop capabilities and remaining as ‘assembly only’ plants. Other more dynamic plants developed process engineering and product design skills, investing heavily in capability building. One common determinant in capability building appears to be the overall technology strategy of the global value chain leader (or parent company). In those subsidiaries which did not upgrade beyond assembly, technology decisions and processes were tightly controlled within the parent headquarter locations in relatively centralised international value networks. By contrast, the more dynamic plants exercised more discretion over local capability building. The latter operated in relatively decentralised networks, more open to domestic policies to encourage upgrading. The study suggests that governments should tailor upgrading policies not only according to the approximate level of capabilities attained by local subsidiaries, but also according to how receptive subsidiaries are to upgrading, arguing that capability building and policy receptiveness go hand-in-hand. Other countries hoping to upgrade the quality of foreign direct investment might also wish to focus policies on the more technologically capable, ambitious and receptive categories of foreign subsidiary

Topics: N214 Organisational development, N215 Change and Innovation, N216 Entrepreneurship
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.brighton.ac.uk:2463

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). 1 and Virasa,T.2 doi
  2. (1996). Aiming for 2020: a Demand-driven Perspective on
  3. (2001). Assessing Technological Capabilities: An Audit Tool, Report to World Bank; doi
  4. (2004). Basics of Qualitative Research,
  5. (1991). Better Stories and Better Constructs: the Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic’, doi
  6. (2003). China’s Manufactured Export Surge: the Competitive Implications for East Asia, Report prepared for the East Asia Department of the World Bank,
  7. (2003). Desenvolvimento Global de Produtos: o papel das subsidiárias brasileiras de fornecedores de equipamentos do setor de telecomunicações. Escola Politécnica. São Paulo, doi
  8. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: a Book of Essays, doi
  9. (2000). Enhancing Policy and Institutional Support for Industrial Technology Development
  10. (1997). Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiatives’, doi
  11. (1975). Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production: doi
  12. (1998). Firms, politics and political economy: patterns of subsidiary-parent linkages and technological capability-building in electronics TNC subsidiaries in Malaysia’,
  13. (1994). Flexible Production Systems and Local Machine Tool Subcontracting: Electronics Components Transnationals in Malaysia’,
  14. (2002). Global product development in the telecommunication industry: an analysis of the Brazilian subsidiaries involvement’
  15. (2003). Innovation in Asian Industrialisation: a Gerschenkronian Perspective’, doi
  16. (1989). Internal differentiation within Multinational Corporations’, doi
  17. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Life Cycle', doi
  18. (2002). International management and strategy’ doi
  19. (1994). Japanese FDI and the Transfer of Japanese Consumer Electronics Production to Malaysia, Report Prepared for UNDP,
  20. (1997). Latecomer Catch-up Strategies in the Semiconductor Business: the Case of Alphatec Group of Thailand and Anam Group of Korea, MSc Thesis, SPRU,
  21. (1989). Managing Across Borders: the Transnational Solution, doi
  22. Managing innovation between global and local innovation system: coordination mechanisms
  23. Micro-dynamics of subsidiary development; subsidiary initiatives, coordination mechanisms and technological capability accumulation
  24. (1994). Motorola Globalisation: The Penang Journey, Lee and Sons,
  25. (1998). Patterns of Technology Acquisition by Manufacturing Firms in Singapore,
  26. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd Ed. ; Thousand Oaks, doi
  27. (1991). Steel: From Ashes Rebuilt to Manufacturing Excellence, Pelanduk Publications, Pataling Jaya,
  28. (1998). Strategic development of multinational subsidiaries doi
  29. (2004). Tax Law, Embassy of Brazil in London.
  30. (1998). Technological Capability Building and the Sustainability of Export Success in Thailand’s Textile and Electronics Industries, doi
  31. (1992). Technological Development Through Sub-contracting Linkages: Evidence from Singapore’, doi
  32. (1998). Technological dynamism and R&D in the export of manufactures from Vietnam’, doi
  33. (2001). Technological Innovation of Industrial Enterprises in Thailand,
  34. (2000). The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centres of Excellence: a Subsidiary Perspective,
  35. (1975). The Product Life Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment', doi
  36. (1988). Using technology as a Path to Subsidiary Development’ doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.