Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A Third Route to the Doomsday Argument

By Paul Franceschi

Abstract

In this paper, I present a solution to the Doomsday argument based on a third type of solution, by contrast to on the one hand, the Carter-Leslie view and on the other hand, the Eckhardt et al. analysis. The present line of thought is based on the fact that both aforementioned analyses are based on an inaccurate analogy. After discussing the imperfections of both models, I present then a two-sided model that fits more adequately with the human situation corresponding to DA and encapsulates both Carter-Leslie's and Eckhardt et al.'s models. I argue then that this new analogy also holds when one takes into account the issue of indeterminism and the reference class problem. This leads finally to a novel formulation of the argument that could well be more consensual than the original one

Topics: Philosophy of Science, Metaphysics
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:2990

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). Investigations into the Doomsday argument', Preprint at http://www.anthropicprinciple.com/preprints/inv/investigations.html

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.