Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Auotmatic detection, consistent mapping, and training

By Dr Siu L. Chow

Abstract

Results from two experiments showed that a flat display﷓size function was found under the consistent mapping (CM) condition despite the facts that there was no extensive CM training and that the stimulus﷓response (S﷓R) consistency was only an intrasession manipulation. A confounding factor might be responsible for the fact that the consistent and the varied S﷓R mapping conditions gave rise to different display﷓size functions in Schneider and Shiffrin's (1977) study. Their claim that automatic detection and controlled search are qualitatively different is also discussed

Topics: Cognitive Psychology
Publisher: Psychonomic Society
Year: 1986
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:2959

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In
  2. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In
  3. (1985). Categorization (restructuring) and automatization: Two separable factors.
  4. (1983). Category and word search: Generalizing search principles to complex processing.
  5. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
  6. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.
  7. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In
  8. (1983). Reassessing the automaticity-control distinction: Item recognition as a paradigm case.
  9. (1976). The psychology of memory.
  10. (1973). Visual recognition in a theory of information processing.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.