Article thumbnail

Mixing with Medics

By Matthew Smith

Abstract

Historians are increasingly required to produce research that makes an impact. This is particularly the case for medical historians, partly because of our funders' expectations, but also because there is a sense that medical history can inform today's thorny debates about health. Unfortunately, many historians struggle to make an impact. I suggest that participating in medical conferences (broadly defined), not only provides opportunities to make an impact on the medical community, but also offers chances to observe and participate in medical history as it happens

Topics: Second Opinions
Publisher: Oxford University Press
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3063957
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1992). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice,
  2. (2010). History, Medical Humanities and Medical Education’,
  3. (2009). History, Policy and the Social History of Medicine’,
  4. Message from the President of the United States Relative to Mental Illness and Mental Retardation’,
  5. (2007). Multidisciplinary Public Health: What Sort of Victory?’,
  6. (1959). My Name is Legion: Foundations for a Theory of Man in Relation to Culture,
  7. (2004). Pierre Berton, 84, Popular Canadian Historian Dies’,
  8. (2008). Psychiatry Limited: Hyperactivity and the Evolution of
  9. (1958). Social Class and Mental Illness,
  10. The Future of Psychiatry: The Report on the Joint Commission on Mental Illness and Health’,
  11. The Presidential Address: Adaptation to the Unknown’,
  12. The Presidential Address: Cultural Dissonance and Psychiatry’,
  13. The Presidential Address: Novalescence’,
  14. The Presidential Address: Preparedness for Progress’,
  15. (2004). Why Slaughter? The Cultural Dimensions of Britain’s Foot and Mouth Disease Control Policy, 1892–2001’,