Article thumbnail

When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization

By Francesca C. Fortenbaugh and Lynn C. Robertson

Abstract

Much research concerning attention has focused on changes in the perceptual qualities of objects while attentional states were varied. Here, we address a complementary question—namely, how perceived location can be altered by the distribution of sustained attention over the visual field. We also present a new way to assess the effects of distributing spatial attention across the visual field. We measured magnitude judgments relative to an aperture edge to test perceived location across a large range of eccentricities (30°), and manipulated spatial uncertainty in target locations to examine perceived location under three different distributions of spatial attention. Across three experiments, the results showed that changing the distribution of sustained attention significantly alters known foveal biases in peripheral localization

Topics: Article
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3063879
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.
  2. (1986). A spatial property of the retino-cortical mapping.
  3. (2004). Attention alters appearance.
  4. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.
  5. (2005). Attention shift not memory averaging reduces foveal bias.
  6. (2004). Attention to stimulus features shifts spectral tuning of V4 neurons during natural vision.
  7. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.
  8. (2001). Characterizing visual performance fields: Effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.
  9. (2001). Compression of space in visual memory.
  10. (2002). Detecting gaps with and without attention: Further evidence for attentional receptive fields.
  11. (2005). Does L/M cone opponency disappear in human periphery?
  12. (2008). Evidence for attentional processing in spatial localization.
  13. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: An attentional repulsion effect.
  14. (1999). Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation.
  15. (2005). Localization judgments under various levels of attention.
  16. (2008). Mislocalization of a target toward subjective contours: Attentional modulation of location signals.
  17. (2011). Mislocalization of peripheral targets during fixation.
  18. (1993). On the time course and accuracy of spatial localization: Basic data and a two-process model.
  19. (1999). Parametric population representation of retinal location: Neuronal interaction dynamics in cat primary cortex.
  20. (1999). Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery.
  21. (2008). Relative mislocalization of successively presented stimuli.
  22. (2000). Shifting baselines in attention research.
  23. (2000). Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity.
  24. (1999). Sustained focal attention and peripheral letter recognition. Spatial Vision,
  25. Temporal performance fields: Visual and attentional factors.
  26. (1990). The attention system of the human brain.
  27. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space.
  28. (1998). The phenomenology of attention: Part 1. Color, location, orientation, and “clarity.
  29. (1991). The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex: A revision of the classic Holmes map.
  30. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.
  31. (2006). Visual spatial localization and the two-process model.
  32. (1997). Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.
  33. (1989). Wide-angle memories of closeup scenes.